Cited by 64Social Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its ImpactsMedia and Digital Communication

Social Media for Social Good or Evil: An Introduction

Open access
Hemsley, Jeff, Jacobson, Jenna, Gruzd, Anatoliy, Mai, Philip·2018·Social Media + Society

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In the heyday of social media, individuals around the world held high hopes for the democratizing force of social media; however, in light of the recent public outcry of privacy violations, fake news, and Russian troll farms, much of optimism toward social media has waned in favor of skepticism, fear, and outrage. This special issue critically explores the question, “Is social media for good or evil?” While good and evil are both moral terms, the research addresses whether the benefits of using social media in society outweigh the drawbacks. To help conceptualize this topic, we examine some of the benefits (good) and drawbacks (evil) of using social media as discussed in eight papers from the 2017 International Conference on Social Media and Society. This thematic collection reflects a broad range of topics, using diverse methods, from authors around the world and highlights different ways that social media is used for good, or evil, or both. We conclude that the determination of good and evil depends on where you stand, but as researchers, we need to go a step further to understand who it is good for and who it might hurt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2056305118786719

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research repeatedly indicates that people derive tremendous benefits from being on social media.

    “At the same time, it is important to recognize that research repeatedly indicates that people derive tremendous benefits from being on social media (Quan-Haase & Young, 2010;Hemsley, Jacobson, Gruzd, & Mai, 2018).”

    From Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2021) · cites this paper as Hemsley, Jacobson, Gruzd, & Mai, 2018

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 10 · Cited by 64

Authors
Hemsley, J., Jacobson, J., Gruzd, A., & Mai, P.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hemsley, Jeff
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2018-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883134502
Cited by
64
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Syracuse University
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media, democratization, privacy violations, fake news, social media and society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review