Grievance Articulation and Community Reactions in the Men’s Rights Movement Online
Open accessAbstract
The Men’s Rights movements have grown extensively in the last four decades. Social media platforms, especially online communities, have been instrumental in the rise of the movement. Despite this, few studies have directly examined how the Men’s Rights movement frames its grievance in online spaces or analyzed community reactions to user-contributed content. To fill these gaps, we analyze 70,580 posts contributed to /r/MensRights, a large community of Men’s Rights activists on Reddit, using a combination of topic models and negative binomial regression. Our results indicate that users active on /r/MensRights have developed a core set of grievances. Due to the mechanics of Reddit, where users can upvote posts to increase their visibility, contributed content that is consistent with community norms is prominently featured. Online spaces such as /r/MensRights provide an optimal combination of self-reinforcing community norms and anonymity, providing social movements with powerful tools to expand their reach, recruit new members, and expand its political power. We argue that these dynamics apply more generally to social movement mobilization that occurs online.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Echo chambers were partially observed in specific Subreddits.
“However, echo chambers were partially observed in specific Subreddits [59], as mentioned previously.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
User leaning was also estimated by activity in specific groups, by semantics in the posts, calculation of political slant of visited websites by the user, and shared news URLs with news outlets leaning score.
“User leaning was also estimated by activity in specific groups (e.g., [59,127,143]), by semantics in the posts (e.g., [94,99,113]), calculation of political slant of visited websites by the user [124], shared news URLs with news outlets leaning score (e.g., [8,96,129]).”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Cites
The online disinhibition effect
Suler, J. (2004) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/1094931041291295 · Cited by 4,375 · see citing works
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Smith, J., McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., & Augustyn, B. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0053 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
MESSNER, M. A. (1998) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243298012003002 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rafail, P., & Freitas, I.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rafail, Patrick
- ORCID
- Rafail, Patrick
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2939415020
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Tulane University’s Senate Committee on Research (COR-600897)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- men's rights movement, online communities, Reddit, social movement mobilization, community norms, anonymity, user-generated content, topic modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review