Cited by 8Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsLegal Studies and PoliciesLaw, Rights, and Freedoms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Law for ethnographers

Open access
Elliott, Tracey, Fleetwood, Jennifer·2017·Methodological Innovations

Abstract

Despite a long history of ethnographic research on crime, ethnographers have shied away from examining the law as it relates to being present at, witnessing and recording illegal activity. However, knowledge of the law is an essential tool for researchers and the future of ethnographic research on crime. This article reviews the main relevant legal statutes in England and Wales and considers their relevance for contemporary ethnographic research. We report that researchers have no legal responsibility to report criminal activity (with some exceptions). The circumstances under which legal action could be taken to seize research data are specific and limited, and respondent’s privacy is subject to considerable legal protection. Our review gives considerable reason to be optimistic about the future of ethnographic research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2059799117720607

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.7312/adle94604 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.4135/9781412984973 · DOI
  3. Armstrong G, 1993, Interpreting the Field: Accounts of Ethnography, 3, 10.1093/oso/9780198258414.003.0001 · DOI
  4. 10.1057/9781137379405_16 · DOI
  5. Ashworth A, 2013, Positive Obligations in Criminal Law
  6. Becker HS, 1963, Outsiders
  7. 10.1126/science.1164100 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0038038507078925 · DOI
  9. 10.1503/cmaj.109-4717 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01539.x · DOI
  11. Coomber R, 2002, Addiction Research & Theory, 10, 1, 10.1080/16066350290001678 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.5153/sro.678 · DOI
  13. 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/bjc/42.4.762 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0044118X95027001005 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1080/07418829700093201 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc171.pub2 · DOI
  18. Finch E, 2001, Mountbatten Journal of Legal Studies, 34
  19. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00055-X · DOI
  20. Fleetwood J (2009) Women in the international cocaine trade: Gender, choice and agency in context. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
  21. Fraser A, 2016, Urban Legends: Gang Identity in the Post-Industrial City
  22. Garrett B, 2014, Explore Everything: Place-Hacking the City
  23. Goffman A, 2015, On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City
  24. Gunter A, 2010, Growing Up Bad? Black Youth, ‘Road’ Culture and Badness in an East London Neighbourhood
  25. 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/1466138112440983 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/he/9780199693603.001.0001 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/bjc/azw045. · DOI
  29. 10.2307/1142325 · DOI
  30. Lee RM, 1993, Doing Research on Sensitive Topics
  31. Lubet S (2014) Ethics on the run: Review of On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City (Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries), by Alice Goffman. Available at: http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run
  32. 10.1080/13645570701804250 · DOI
  33. Polsky N, 1985, Hustlers, Beats, and Others
  34. 10.1177/0022042612465275 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/089124194023002001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Schmidt P (2012) Case puts researchers’ confidentiality pledges on trial. The Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 58, issue 18, 6 January. Available at: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Case-Puts-Researchers/130232/
  37. Stone R, 2016, Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice
  38. Sutherland E, 1960, Principles of Criminology
  39. 10.1093/bjc/azr027 · DOI
  40. Wadham J, 2015, Blackstone’s Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998
  41. Walker C, 2010, Criminal Law Review, 6, 441
  42. Williams G, 1961, Criminal Law: The General Part
  43. Witeveen A (2015) Boston college oral history project faces ongoing legal issues. Library Journal, 12 March. Available at: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2015/03/litigation/boston-college-oral-history-project-faces-ongoing-legal-issues/#_

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elliott, T., & Fleetwood, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fleetwood, Jennifer
Venue
Methodological Innovations
Published
2017-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
ISSN
2059-7991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2753869962
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methodological Innovations (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Studies and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
respondent privacy, research ethics, England and Wales law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review