Cited by 10Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Preliminary benefits of information therapy

Open access
Keene, Nikki, Chesser, Amy, Hart, Traci A., Twumasi-Ankrah, Philip, Bradham, Douglas D.·2011·Journal of Primary Care & Community Health

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Information therapy (ie, information prescriptions) is a potential new tool for primary care physicians that could improve patient knowledge, decision making, and communication between physicians and patients. Although patients have access to numerous health-related articles online, the availability of this health information does not ensure improved knowledge or better health decisions by patients. Communication between patients and physicians is often limited and messages are commonly misunderstood. Information therapy offers a potential solution for the primary care environment. METHOD: Two employers, in different geographical locations of the Midwest, offered the MedEncentive program to employees and their dependents as a part of their health plans. This program also offers primary care physicians the opportunity to prescribe information to patients during office visits. Patients were then eligible to participate in this information therapy (Ix) through a Web-based platform. Both primary care physicians and patients were financially incentivized for participation. Physicians received a monetary stipend for prescribing evidence-based information therapy and patients were refunded part or all of their copayment for reading their condition-specific Ix and answering questions about knowledge, compliance, health status, and satisfaction with the care they received compared to the evidence from the Ix. RESULTS: Patients received information therapy from their primary care physicians and reported a high level of satisfaction with care, improved health status, and compliance with pharmaceutical prescriptions. DISCUSSION: This case study had a number of limitations and as such the results should be interpreted with caution. However, there is a need for an immediate solution as patient satisfaction with their care and compliance with pharmaceutical prescriptions continue to decrease, despite the amounts of widely available health information. These preliminary findings suggest that information therapy through a Web-based platform, augmented by doctor-patient mutual accountability, could be part of the solution for the current ambulatory health care environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2150131910385005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Greene J. Celebrating Five Years of Success: Examining a Groundbreaking Solution for Controlling Health Care Costs Using Financial Incentives to Invoke Doctor-Patient Mutal Accountability. 1st ed. Oklahoma City, OK: MedEncentive, Inc; 2009:56.
  2. Davis L, Glowka A, Loyo K, Schwertfeger R, Danielson L, Brea C. A comprehensive worksite wellness program in Aus- tin, Texas: partnership between Steps to a Healthier Austin and Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A60.

Authors
Keene, N., Chesser, A., Hart, T. A., Twumasi-Ankrah, P., & Bradham, D. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas, USA
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chesser, Amy
  • Hart, Traci A.
  • Bradham, Douglas D.
Venue
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Published
2011-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
45-48
ISSN
  • 2150-1319 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-1327
OpenAlex
W2324601665
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Primary Care & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
information therapy, information prescriptions, patient-provider communication, patient satisfaction, medication adherence, online health information, financial incentives, employer-sponsored health insurance, primary care, patient knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review