Cited by 85Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsMental Health Treatment and Access

Marital Processes around Depression: A Gendered and Relational Perspective

Open access
Thomeer, Mieke Beth, Umberson, Debra, Pudrovska, Tetyana·2013·Society and Mental Health

Abstract

Despite extensive evidence of the importance of marriage and marital processes for mental health, little is known about the interpersonal processes around depression within marriage and the extent to which these processes are gendered. We use a mixed-methods approach to explore the importance of gender in shaping processes around depression within marriage. We approach this in two ways: First, using quantitative longitudinal analysis of 2,601 couples from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we address whether depressive symptoms in one spouse shape the other spouse’s depressive symptoms and whether men or women are more influential in this process. We find that a wife’s depressive symptoms influence her husband’s future depressive symptoms, but a husband’s depressive symptoms do not influence his wife’s future symptoms. Second, we conduct a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 29 couples wherein one or both spouses experienced depression to provide additional insight into how gender impacts depression and reactions to depression within marriage. Our study points to the importance of cultural scripts of masculinity and femininity in shaping depression and emotional processes within marriage and highlights the importance of applying a gendered couple-level approach to better understand the mental health effects of marital processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2156869313487224

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growing body of evidence indicates that partners' emotional states mutually influence one another.

    “A growing body of evidence indicates that partners’ emotional states mutually influence one another [56,61–64].”

    From Fathers at risk: Effects of threatened and actual preterm birth on the course of paternal peripartum depression and anxiety (2026) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Discussion says depressive symptoms can spread between spouses over time, supporting influence between partners. But the Results—HRS Data > Autoregressive Models find that wives’ symptoms consistently predict husbands’ later symptoms, while husbands’ symptoms generally do not predict wives’ later symptoms. The paper therefore does not support mutual influence as a consistently bidirectional finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 85 · Cited by 85

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bird Chloe E Rieker Patricia P 2008 Gender and Health: The Effects of Constrained Choices and Social Policies Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  2. Charmaz Kathy 2006 Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis London Sage Publications
  3. Connell RW 2005 Masculinities Berkeley, CA University of California Press
  4. Erickson RJ 2005 Why Emotion Work Matters: Sex, Gender, and the Division of Household Labor Journal of Marriage and Family 67 337 351
  5. Ferree Myra Marx 1990 Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research Journal of Marriage and the Family 52 866 884
  6. Ferree Myra Marx 2010 Filling the Glass: Gender Perspectives on Family Journal of Marriage and Family 72 420 439
  7. Hochschild AR 2003 The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling Univ of California Press
  8. Joiner Thomas E Katz Jennifer 1999 Contagion of Depressive Symptoms and Mood: Meta-Analytic Review and Explanations from Cognitive, Behavioral, and Interpersonal Viewpoints Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 6 149 164
  9. Juster F Thomas Suzman Richard 1995 An Overview of the Health and Retirement Study The Journal of Human Resources 30 S7 S56
  10. Kline Rex B 2011 Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling New York The Guilford Press
  11. Marks Nadine Lambert James David 1998 Marital Status Continuity and Change among Young and Midlife Adults Journal of Family Issues 19 652 686
  12. Mirowsky John Ross Catherine 2003 Social Causes of Psychological Distress New York Aldine De Gruyter
  13. Moen P Kim JE Hofmeister H 2001 Couples' Work/Retirement Transitions, Gender, and Marital Quality Social Psychology Quarterly 55 71
  14. Pfeffer Carla A 2010 “Women's Work? ” Women Partners of Transgender Men Doing Housework and Emotion Work” Journal of Marriage and Family 72 165 183
  15. Ridgeway CL 2011 Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World Oxford University Press USA
  16. Risman Barbara J Johnson-Sumerford Danette 1998 Doing It Fairly: A Study of Postgender Marriages Journal of Marriage and Family 60 23 40
  17. Rosenfield Sarah Vertefuille Jean McAlpine Donna D 2000 Gender Stratification and Mental Health: An Exploration of Dimensions of the Self Social Psychology Quarterly 63 208 223
  18. Schnittker Jason McLeod Jane D 2005 The Social Psychology of Health Disparities Annual Review of Sociology 31 75 103
  19. Zapf D 2002 Emotion Work and Psychological Well-Being: A Review of the Literature and Some Conceptual Considerations Human Resource Management Review 12 237 268

Authors
Thomeer, M. B., Umberson, D., & Pudrovska, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Society and Mental Health
Published
2013-05-20
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
151-169
ISSN
  • 2156-8693 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-8731
OpenAlex
W2119879342
Cited by
85
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Society and Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG026613)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, gender differences, spousal influence, couples, masculinity, femininity, cultural scripts, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review