Using Targeted Feedback to Address Common Student Misconceptions in Introductory Programming: A Data-Driven Approach
Open accessAbstract
With the expansion of computer science (CS) education, CS teachers in K-12 schools should be cognizant of student misconceptions and be prepared to help students establish accurate understanding of computer science and programming. Digital tools, such as automated assessment systems, can be useful and supportive in teaching CS courses. This two-stage design-based research (DBR) study investigated the effects of targeted feedback in an automated assessment system for addressing common misconceptions of high school students in a Java-based introductory programming course. Based on students’ common errors and underlying misconceptions, targeted feedback messages were designed and provided for students. The quantitative analysis found that with targeted feedback students were more likely to correct the errors in their code. The qualitative analysis of students’ solutions revealed that when improving the code, students receiving feedback made fewer intermediate incorrect solutions. In other words, the targeted feedback messages may help to promote conceptual change and facilitate learning. Although the findings of this exploratory study showed evidence of the power of digital tools, more research is needed to make technology benefit more CS teachers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905 · see citing works
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · see citing works
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
Do Enhanced Compiler Error Messages Help Students?: Results Inconclusive.
Pettit, R. S., Homer, J., & Gee, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3017680.3017768 · Cited by 66 · cited 8× · see citing works
“The other type of feedback system uses manually designed feedback messages for common student errors identified using the student data in the automated assessment system (Becker, 2016; Denny, Luxton-Reilly, & Carpenter, 2014; Pettit et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Lin, C.-J., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13733-z · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Jiangnan University (CN)
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qian, Yizhou
- Venue
- Sage Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981974458
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- fundamental research funds for the central universities (JUSRP11982)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- targeted feedback, student misconceptions, introductory programming, automated assessment systems, high school computer science education, Java programming, conceptual change, error correction, feedback messages, K-12 computer science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review