Cited by 164Technology Adoption and User BehaviourDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Trust and Consumers’ Purchase Intention in a Social Commerce Platform: A Meta-Analytic Approach

Open access
Wang, Jian, Shahzad, Fakhar, Ahmad, Zeeshan, Abdullah, Muhammad, Hassan, Nadir Munir·2022·Sage Open

Abstract

E-commerce and social media integration are becoming increasingly popular throughout the world, particularly with the emergence of Web 2.0 technology. In a social commerce (SC) environment, trust also plays a vital role in consumers’ purchase intentions. This research aims to achieve consistent findings regarding the concise effect of trust on consumers’ purchase intention and the moderating effect of SC constructs in social commerce platforms. A meta-analysis, including 20 effect sizes from 19 studies, investigated the association between trust and consumers’ purchase intention. The outcomes demonstrate that trust positively influences consumers’ purchase intentions. Meanwhile, moderation analysis points out that trust in sellers has a larger significant effect than other trust objects. Meanwhile, consumers in forums and communities can gain more trust, affecting their purchase intentions. In terms of website types, trust has a similar influence on purchase intention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21582440221091262

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Wang, J., Shahzad, F., Ahmad, Z., Abdullah, M., & Hassan, N. M.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (CN)
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • Air University (PK)
  • Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (PK)
Corresponding author
Shahzad, Fakhar
Venue
Sage Open
Published
2022-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
ISSN
2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293108603
Cited by
164
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 6
FWCI
22.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • General Project of Humanities and Social Science Research in Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (2022-ZZJH-420)
  • Key Funded Project of Educational Reform Research and Practice of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Zhengzhou University of Light Industry Educational Reform [2021] No. 1, 033)
  • Key Program of Teaching Reform in Higher Education of Heilongjiang Province (SJGZ20200148)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
trust, purchase intention, social commerce, consumer behavior, seller trust, online forums, online communities, e-commerce platforms, Web 2.0, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review