RETRACTED: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of General Population Toward Utilizing ChatGPT: A Cross-sectional Study
Open accessAbstract
ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence-based program, has been used by numerous users in various fields. This study aimed to determine to knowledge, attitude, and practices of the general population toward the use of ChatGPT. We invited the general population residing in Karachi, Pakistan from January to March 2023 in the study. The invitees participated in this study by filling out an online questionnaire through various social media platforms. The questionnaire assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the general population toward ChatGPT. We recruited a total of 525 participants for the study. The average age of the participants was 27.7 ± 0.46. The results indicated that 400 (76.2%) of the participants were familiar with ChatGPT. Although 51.4% of the participants did not use ChatGPT frequently, 50.1% believed that utilizing ChatGPT could potentially diminish their cognitive abilities. Nevertheless, a significant number of participants (40.0%) did not express concern about encountering privacy and security issues while using ChatGPT. The gender and education level were statistically significant predictors of the ChatGPT practices, while age and occupation did not had a significant impact. In conclusion, the study showed that a majority of participants were familiar with ChatGPT and believed in its ability to understand and respond to user queries. They also had confidence in the accuracy of information provided by ChatGPT, indicating a moderate level of trust. Int…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors such as institutional culture, faculty demographics, and prior exposure to technology can influence the effectiveness of GenAI integration strategies.
“Factors such as institutional culture, faculty demographics, and prior exposure to technology can influence the effectiveness of GenAI integration strategies [8, 17]”
From Understanding the Practices, Perceptions, and (Dis)Trust of Generative AI among Instructors: A Mixed-methods Study in the U.S. Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Bodani, N., Lal, A., Maqsood, A., Altamash, S., Ahmed, N., & Heboyan, A.
- Affiliations
- Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine (PK)
- Aga Khan University (PK)
- Bahria University (PK)
- Yerevan State Medical University (AM)
- Corresponding author
- Heboyan, Artak
- Venue
- Sage Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389050497
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2026-05-15)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, generative AI, public knowledge and attitudes, trust in AI, privacy and security concerns, general population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review