Hindsight bias in depression
Open accessAbstract
People tend to be biased by outcome knowledge when looking back on events. This phenomenon is known as hindsight bias. Clinical intuition and theoretical accounts of affect-regulatory functions of hindsight bias suggest a link between hindsight bias and depression, but empirical evidence is scarce. In two experiments, participants with varying levels of depressive symptoms imagined themselves in everyday scenarios that ended positively or negatively and completed hindsight and affect measures. Participants with higher levels of depression judged negative outcomes, but not positive outcomes, as more foreseeable and more inevitable in hindsight. For negative outcomes, they also misremembered prior expectations as more negative than they initially were. This memory hindsight bias was accompanied by disappointment, suggesting a relation to affect-regulatory malfunction. We propose that “depressive hindsight bias” indicates a negative schema of the past and that it sustains negative biases in depression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For expectations toward the intervention, it was only feasible to assess them after participants experienced the intervention, thus making reported (fulfilled) expectations prone to hindsight bias.
“For the expectations toward the intervention, it was only feasible to assess them after participants experienced the intervention, thus making reported (fulfilled) expectations prone to hindsight bias (Groß et al., 2017).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Groß, J., Blank, H., & Bayen, U. J.
- Affiliations
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Groß, Julia
- Venue
- Clinical Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-08-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 771-788
- ISSN
- 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-7034
- OpenAlex
- W2613944122
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- journals.sagepub.com
- Locations
- Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- hindsight bias, depression, outcome expectations, memory bias, disappointment, emotion regulation, negative schemas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review