Cited by 101Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Cognitive Control in Depression: Toward Clinical Models Informed by Cognitive Neuroscience

Open access
Grahek, Ivan, Everaert, Jonas, Krebs, Ruth M., Koster, Ernst H. W.·2018·Clinical Psychological Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cognitive control dysfunctions are thought to contribute to the onset and maintenance of depression. However, the causes and nature of these dysfunctions remain unknown. Here, we critically review contemporary research on cognitive control in depression. We identify three main conceptual issues in this field: (a) uncritical use of the tripartite model, (b) reliance on descriptive explanations, and (c) lack of integration with emotional and motivational impairments. Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience offer possibilities to resolve these issues. We review this progress focusing on the ability to detect the need for control, the role of motivation, and the flexibility-stability balance. We propose that depression-related dysfunctions arise from issues in detecting when, how, and for how long to engage in goal-oriented processing. In conclusion, we argue that integrating advances in cognitive neuroscience into clinical research can help to move from a descriptive toward a more mechanistic understanding of cognitive dysfunctions in depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702618758969

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 101

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2011). Medial Prefrontal Cortex as an action-outcome predictor. Nature Neurosci., 14(10), 1338-1344. http://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2921.Medial · DOI
  2. Fray, P. J., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (1996). Neuorpsychiatyric applications of CANTAB. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 329-336.
  3. Gotlib, I. H., & Furman, D. J. (2015). Depression. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1-15. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772. · DOI
  4. Vittengl, J. R., Clark, L. A., Dunn, T. W., & Jarrett, R. B. (2007). Reducing relapse and recurrence in unipolar depression: A comparative meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral therapy's effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 475-488. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.475.Reducing · DOI

Authors
Grahek, I., Everaert, J., Krebs, R. M., & Koster, E. H. W.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Grahek, Ivan
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
464-480
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2791530334
Cited by
101
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Belgian American Educational Foundation
  • Universiteit Gent (01D02415, BOF16/GOA/017)
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent (BOF16/GOA/017)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
cognitive control, depression, tripartite model, motivation, emotional impairment, motivational impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review