Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The FAIR journey of a patient-driven registry: Reflections and practical solutions from the Duchenne Data Platform FAIRification experience

Lalout, Nawel, Wilkinson, Mark D., Wandrei, Dagmar, Tassoni, Adrian, Atalaia, Antonio, Prieto, Mario, Camara, Alberto, Quemada, Eduardo, Franken, Mirjam, Jonker, Anneliene H., Paliouras, Georgios, Siminiuc, Sergiu, Carta, Claudio, Dos Santos Vieira, Bruna, Roos, Marco, Kaliyaperumal, Rajaram, Evangelista, Teresinha, ‘t Hoen, Peter A.C., Vroom, Elizabeth·2026·Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases

Abstract

Background: Since 2018, World Duchenne Organization, Dutch Duchenne Parent Project, and Duchenne Data Foundation have been championing efforts to make Duchenne-related data reusable in combination with data contained in other registries. Transforming human language into a coded language that machines can understand (“FAIRification”; FAIR, Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) offers a solution. Purpose: To recount and reflect on the process and challenges encountered during the FAIRification of a patient-registry, the Duchenne Data Platform. Methods: The FAIRification plan was developed by a multidisciplinary team that was coordinated by a FAIR project manager. It focused on FAIRifying common data elements for rare disease registrations and patient-related outcome data. Protecting patient privacy and autonomy were at the forefront throughout the process. FAIR data transformation was accomplished through a combination of open-source and custom-written software. Data access for federated exploration was enabled through a privacy-preserving “data-visiting” approach. Results: The plan consisted of 10 main steps and addressed social, legal, ethical, and technical issues. Proof-of-concept testing for interoperability between the Duchenne Data Platform and four other registries demonstrated that FAIR data discovery and reuse was possible. Misconceptions about FAIR data persist, which act as barriers to scaling-up community-level FAIR efforts. Suggestions for overcoming these barriers are provided. Conclusions: Data visiting and federated analyses between registries is possible. Actions to help mitigate hesitation to implement FAIR in practice include seeking out existing FAIR training opportunities, addressing misconceptions as needed, contacting FAIR experts for advice and using the open-source resources that we have shared.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/22143602251382969

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90579-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/mus.23810 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32160-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.08.010 · DOI
  5. 10.3233/JND-210721 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s13023-019-1123-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1186/s13023-024-03059-3 · DOI
  8. 10.4018/jswis.2009081901 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Vasant DCL, Malone J, Hanauer M. Ordo: an ontology conencting rare disease, epidemiology and genetic data. Proc Estonian Acad Sci Biol Ecol 2024.
  10. Golbeck JFG Hartel F Hendler J et al. The National Cancer Institute's thesaurus and ontology (2003). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3199007. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3199007
  11. 10.1162/dint_a_00028 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103897 · DOI
  13. van Soest J, Sun C, Mussmann O, et al. Using the personal health train for automated and privacy-preserving analytics on vertically partitioned data. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 247: 581–585.
  14. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.712569 · DOI
  15. 10.1162/dint_a_00160 · DOI
  16. Alarcón-Moreno P, Wilkinson MD. Take CARE of the patient data. Clinical and registry entries (CARE) semantic model. In: SWAT4HCLS, Leiden, February 26–29, 2024, CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
  17. Mons B, Neylon C, Velterop J, et al. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR data guiding principles for the European open science cloud. Inf Serv Use 2017; 37: 49–56.
  18. 10.1016/j.nmd.2006.09.017 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s13023-019-1088-3 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s13023-019-0998-4 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lalout, N., Wilkinson, M. D., Wandrei, D., Tassoni, A., Atalaia, A., Prieto, M., Camara, A., Quemada, E., Franken, M., Jonker, A. H., Paliouras, G., Siminiuc, S., Carta, C., Dos Santos Vieira, B., Roos, M., Kaliyaperumal, R., Evangelista, T., ‘t Hoen, P. A. C., & Vroom, E.
Venue
Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
Published
2025-10-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
304-315
ISSN
  • 2214-3599
  • 2214-3602
Cited by
4
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The FAIR journey of a patient-driven registry: Reflections and practical solutions from the Duchenne Data Platform FAIRification experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/22143602251382969
The paper
Lalout, N., Wilkinson, M. D., Wandrei, D., Tassoni, A., Atalaia, A., Prieto, M., Camara, A., Quemada, E., Franken, M., Jonker, A. H., Paliouras, G., Siminiuc, S., Carta, C., Dos Santos Vieira, B., Roos, M., Kaliyaperumal, R., Evangelista, T., ‘t Hoen, P. A. C., & Vroom, E. (2026). The FAIR journey of a patient-driven registry: Reflections and practical solutions from the Duchenne Data Platform FAIRification experience. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1177/22143602251382969

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.