Cited by 1Political Economy and MarxismAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentMarxism and Critical Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engels and the Worker–Peasant Alliance

Patnaik, Prabhat·2021·Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES

Abstract

Friedrich Engels’ bicentenary was celebrated in 2020. As a contribution to this celebration, this article argues that Engels, among his various other substantive contributions, must be credited with his conceptualization of the worker–peasant alliance. Given that this alliance was fundamental to democratic and socialist revolutions in the Third World in the twentieth century, and continues to be so in the twenty-first, it remains important to clarify its trajectory within classical Marxism. Engels turned his attention to the sixteenth-century peasant war in Germany so as to illuminate the challenges faced in the course of the 1848 revolutions that swept across Europe. He argued that, for large sections of the peasantry, the throwing off of their feudal yoke required an alliance with the proletariat. This, however, did not mean land redistribution via private landholdings but nationalization of the land. It also did not mean an alliance with the whole of the peasantry. These two questions and the antagonisms that they entailed were central to the development of Marxist theory and practice in the Bolshevik and Chinese revolutions, as well as others in the Third World. Today, neoliberal globalization has shifted the terrain of struggle further by the fact of corporate dominance over the whole of the peasantry. The massive agitation of the Indian agriculturists since the end of 2020 and the alliances that have emerged should be an eye-opener.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/22779760211000937

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Engels F. (2020 [1870]). Preface to the second edition. The peasant war in Germany. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1850/peasant-war-germany/ch0a.htm
  2. Husain I., 2006, Marx on India
  3. Krupskaya N., 1970, Memories of Lenin
  4. Lenin V. I., 1977, Two tactics of social democracy in the democratic revolution
  5. Lenin V. I., 1977, The agrarian programme of social democracy

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Patnaik, P.
Affiliations
Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Venue
Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy: A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES
Published
2021-03-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
184-197
ISSN
  • 2277-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 2321-0281
OpenAlex
W3149758813
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agrarian South Journal of Political Economy A triannual Journal of Agrarian South Network and CARES (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
Keywords
Friedrich Engels, peasants, 1848 revolution, land nationalization, land redistribution, classical Marxism, Russian Revolution, Chinese revolution, Third World revolutions, neoliberal globalization, agrarian conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review