Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Sustainable Circular Economy: Exploring Stakeholder Interests in Finland

Marjamaa, Maili, Salminen, Hanna, Kujala, Johanna, Tapaninaho, Riikka, Heikkinen, Anna·2021·South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases

Abstract

A circular economy (CE) is a promising solution to the looming sustainability crisis. Previous research has shown that a systemic transition from a linear economy to a CE requires stakeholder collaboration across all levels of society. Yet, little is known about stakeholder interests in a CE. The purpose of this study is to examine stakeholder interests regarding a sustainable CE in Finland. The data of 26 expert interviews is analyzed with qualitative content analysis. The study contributes to previous CE research by adding a stakeholder perspective in the examination of a sustainable CE. Stakeholder interests are explicated in terms of value-based motivations, expectations and stakes. We conclude that the consideration of stakeholder interests is relevant for understanding stakeholder collaboration in the CE context. The study shows that the economic, ecological and local social perspectives are emphasized in a sustainable CE. More attention to global social sustainability issues is needed. Research questions: The purpose of our study is to examine stakeholder interests with regard to the sustainable circular economy in Finland. Link to theory: The theoretical framework of the study builds on stakeholder theory, and uses the issue-focused stakeholder approach. We explore stakeholder interests as value-based motivations, expectations and stakes. Thereby, we advance the theoretical and empirical understanding of stakeholder interests and stakeholder collaboration in the context of CE. Phenomenon studied: Stakeholders have a prominent role in promoting the transition to the sustainable CE. This study focuses on a core issue in stakeholder theory: stakeholder interests. In doing so, the study creates knowledge on the nuanced interests and collaboration towards the sustainable CE. Case context: The context of our study is Finland, the northernmost member state of the European Union. Finland provides with an interesting research context as the target of the Finnish government is to make Finland a global leader in the circular economy by 2025. Findings: The findings indicate that the key stakeholders share a joint interest in promoting a sustainable CE. Stakeholders are active in shaping actions towards a sustainable CE, too. Stakeholders emphasize the economic and ecological interests, while social interests - especially wider global social sustainability perspective - remains less important especially among companies and partly industrial organizations. Discussions: Building on stakeholder theory, the study provides a nuanced understanding of how stakeholder interests can be defined and examined as value-based motivations, expectations and stakes. The study demonstrates that stakeholders simultaneously pursue their own CE interests as well as shared interests to promote the sustainable CE in Finland. Moreover, the study suggests that stakeholder interests can be used to create understanding of the dimensions of sustainable development that constitute the sustainable CE. More specifically, the study shows that economic, ecological and local social perspectives related to the sustainable CE are predominantly emphasized. Analyzing stakeholder interests is important since they create a foundation for stakeholder engagement, stakeholder relationships and value creation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2277977921991914

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.5465/amr.2003.8925191 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-71312-0_24 · DOI
  3. Carroll A. B., 1989, Business & society
  4. Eriksson P., 2016, Qualitative methods in business research: A practical guide to social research.
  5. Freeman R. E., 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach
  6. 10.1017/CBO9780511815768 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.030 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1086026614535786 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s10551-012-1379-2 · DOI
  13. Kujala J., 2002, Sidosryhmät eettisen liiketoiminnan kirittäjinä
  14. Kujala J., 2019, Leading change in a complex world: Transdisciplinary perspectives, 123
  15. 10.1017/9781108123495.014 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Myllykangas P., 2009, Sidosryhmäsuhteet liiketoiminnan arvon luomisessa: palveluyksiköstä liiketoiminnaksi, episodi yrityksen elämää
  19. Näsi J., 1995, Understanding stakeholder thinking, 19
  20. 10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3 · DOI
  21. 10.4135/9781446282243.n12 · DOI
  22. Tuomi J., 2009, Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi
  23. Yin R. K., 2014, Case study research: Design and methods

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marjamaa, M., Salminen, H., Kujala, J., Tapaninaho, R., & Heikkinen, A.
Affiliations
Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Venue
South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases
Published
2021-04
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
50-62
ISSN
  • 2277-9779
  • 2321-0303
Cited by
62
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review