Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 67

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of Injuries Associated With Sport Specialization and Intense Training Patterns in Young Athletes: A Longitudinal Clinical Case-Control Study

Jayanthi, Neeru, Kleithermes, Stephanie, Dugas, Lara, Pasulka, Jacqueline, Iqbal, Sara, LaBella, Cynthia·2020·Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: There are no clinical longitudinal studies exploring the associations between sport specialization and intense training patterns and injuries in young athletes. Purpose: To prospectively determine the relationship between young athletes’ degree of sport specialization and their risk of injuries and reinjuries. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Young athletes aged between 7 and 18 years presenting for sports-related injuries or sports physical examinations were recruited from either sports medicine clinics or pediatric/family medicine offices. Each participant completed a baseline survey at enrollment and an identical follow-up survey every 6 months for 3 years. Surveys assessed training patterns and injuries. Injury type (acute, overuse, or serious overuse) and clinical diagnosis were also recorded from electronic medical records. Results: Of the 1208 participants who provided consent, 579 (48%) completed the baseline survey and first follow-up survey at 6 months (mean age, 14.1 ± 2.3 years; 53% female). Of this sample, 27% (158/579) of participants were uninjured, and 73% (421/579) were injured, with 29% (121/421) of injuries classified as reinjuries. Consistent with previous studies, over the 3-year study period, the degree of sport specialization had an effect such that more specialized athletes were significantly more likely to be injured ( P = .03) or have an overuse injury ( P = .02) compared with less specialized athletes after adjusting for potential confounders. Additionally, female athletes were more at risk for all injuries ( P = .01) and overuse injuries ( P = .02) after adjusting for covariates. Finally, young athletes who trained in weekly hours in excess of their age or who trained twice as many hours as their free play were significantly more likely to be injured on univariate analysis (both P < .001). Conclusion: Our study confirms that over time, young athletes, and in particular young female athletes, were more likely to be injured and sustain an overuse injury if they had a higher degree of sport specialization. Similarly, those athletes whose training hours exceeded thair age or whose sports hours exceeded their free play by a factor of greater than 2 were also more likely to develop injuries and overuse injuries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2325967120922764

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1177/0363546516629943 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094962 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1542/peds.2007-0887 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1542/peds.2016-2148 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.3389/fped.2019.00268 · DOI
  6. 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181fdba58 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093299 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000060 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1123/jsr.2013-0101 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1542/peds.106.1.154 · DOI
  11. Jayanthi N, 2011, J Med Sci Tennis, 16, 14
  12. 10.1177/1941738112464626 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000293 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/0363546514567298 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.4085/1062-6050-380-18 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099863 · DOI
  17. Kocher MS, 2019, Orthop J Sports Med, 7
  18. 10.1177/2325967116644241 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1177/0363546517710213 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1941738115598747 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1177/1941738117714160 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0363546517690848 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2147/OAJSM.S96821 · DOI
  24. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001142 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/17408980601060358 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Jayanthi, N., Kleithermes, S., Dugas, L., Pasulka, J., Iqbal, S., & LaBella, C.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Orthopaedics and Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA.
  • Institute for Sports Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Venue
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
8
Issue
6
ISSN
2325-9671
Cited by
67
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.