Changes in Income-Based Gaps in Parent Activities With Young Children From 1988 to 2012
Open accessAbstract
Numerous studies show large differences between economically advantaged and disadvantaged parents in the quality and quantity of their engagement in young children’s development. This “parenting gap” may account for a substantial portion of the gap in children’s early cognitive skills. However, researchers know little about whether the socioeconomic gap in parenting has increased over time. The present study investigates this question, focusing on income- and education-based gaps in parents’ engagement in cognitively stimulating activities with preschool-aged children. We draw on data from four national studies conducted over 25 years. We found a decrease in income-based gaps in children’s book ownership and library attendance but increasing income-based gaps for several other parent behaviors, including reading and telling stories to children and teaching children letters, words, and numbers. Income-based gaps in children’s participation in out-of-home cultural activities also increased. Results for education-based gaps were similar. These gaps largely arose from top-income families pulling away from their middle- and low-income counterparts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More educated mothers not only spend more time on childcare overall, but also tailor this time more closely to their children's developmental needs, and the overall gap in childcare time between more- and less-educated parents is especially large for education-oriented activities.
“Such a channel is supported by evidence that more educated mothers not only spend more time on childcare overall, but also tailor this time more closely to their children's developmental needs (Kalil, Ryan, and Corey 2012), and that the overall gap in childcare time between more-and less-educated parents is especially large for education-oriented activities (Ramey and Ramey 2010;Kalil et al. 2016;”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Kalil et al. 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Income Inequality and Class Divides in Parental Investments
Schneider, D., Hastings, O. P., & LaBriola, J. (2018) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418772034 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kalil, A., Ziol-Guest, K. M., Ryan, R. M., & Markowitz, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- New York University
- Georgetown University (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Venue
- AERA Open
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2332-8584 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2517371671
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 28.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- AERA Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Administration for Children and Families
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- income inequality, socioeconomic status, parent-child interaction, early childhood cognitive development, book ownership, library attendance, reading to children, storytelling, literacy education, numeracy instruction, cultural activities, educational attainment, preschool children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review