Scaling Up: Representing Gender Diversity in Survey Research
Open accessAbstract
Survey measures of gender have been critiqued for failing to reflect the diversity of the population. Conventionally, respondents to national surveys are categorized as female or male. Calls for improvement have centered on adding additional categories, such as transgender. We propose that in addition to revising categorical gender measures, national surveys should incorporate gradational measures of femininity and masculinity to better reflect gender diversity and sharpen models of gender inequality. Our results from two national pilot studies show that conventional measures mask significant variation within the categories of female and male. For example, less than a quarter of respondents reported that they are very feminine or masculine, respectively, and not at all the other. We also demonstrate that scale responses can be treated as independent variables in studies of inequality or as dependent variables that allow gender identification to be an outcome of social processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The invisibility of gender expression in most social surveys has made gender policing difficult to document as a population-level process.
“Despite ethnographic evidence, however, the invisibility of gender expression in most social surveys has made gender policing difficult to document as a population-level process.”
From Homophobic Bullying as Gender Policing: Population-Based Evidence (2023) · cites this paper as Magliozzi, Saperstein and Westbrook 2016
Cites
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954 · see citing works
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091 · see citing works
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008 · see citing works
Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y · Cited by 1,618 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suen, L. W., Lunn, M. R., Sevelius, J. M., Flentje, A., Capriotti, M. R., Lubensky, M. E., Hunt, C., Weber, S., Bahati, M., Rescate, A., et al. (2022) · LGBT Health · doi:10.1089/lgbt.2021.0159 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Homophobic Bullying as Gender Policing: Population-Based Evidence
Mittleman, J. (2023) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432221138091 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Magliozzi, D., Saperstein, A., & Westbrook, L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Grand Valley State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Magliozzi, Devon
- Venue
- Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Volume
- 2
- ISSN
- 2378-0231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2514365352
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- gender measurement, gender diversity, femininity, masculinity, transgender people, gender inequality, national survey, gender categories, gender identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review