The joint role of HRM and leadership for teleworker well-being: An analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The sudden and extensive implementation of teleworking in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic has threatened employees’ well-being. Based on the challenges that particularly threatened such well-being in the beginning of the pandemic, we identify sets of telework-specific HRM practices and leadership behaviors, and examine their joint relationships with teleworkers’ happiness well-being in terms of work engagement and job satisfaction. Thus, we also consider the mediating roles of social isolation (as an indicator of social well-being) and psychological strain (as an indicator of health well-being). We also expect that HRM and leadership should interact and reinforce each other. Our analyses are based on data from German teleworkers at two consecutive points in time. Our findings reveal differentiated and complementary effects of telework-oriented HRM and leadership. In particular, we identified the provision of health care to contribute most to telework-oriented HRM’s relationship with social isolation and happiness well-being. Telework-oriented leadership mainly affected teleworkers’ happiness well-being via strain by ensuring communication and information exchanges between teleworkers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Telework-oriented leadership reduces psychological strain.
“Telework-oriented leadership reduces psychological strain”
From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Günther et al. (2022)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 84 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Günther, N., Hauff, S., & Gubernator, P.
- Affiliations
- Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Günther, Niklas
- Venue
- German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-03-24
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-379
- ISSN
- 0179-6437 (ISSN-L)
- 2397-0022
- 2397-0030
- OpenAlex
- W4220804374
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- remote work, teleworkers, employee well-being, COVID-19 pandemic, human resource management practices, leadership behavior, work engagement, job satisfaction, social isolation, psychological strain, health care delivery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review