Cited by 234Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Hippocampal—diencephalic—cingulate networks for memory and emotion: an anatomical guide

Open access
Bubb, Emma J., Kinnavane, Lisa, Aggleton, John P.·2017·Brain and Neuroscience Advances

Abstract

This review brings together current knowledge from tract tracing studies to update and reconsider those limbic connections initially highlighted by Papez (1937) for their presumed role in emotion. These connections link hippocampal and parahippocampal regions with the mammillary bodies, the anterior thalamic nuclei, and the cingulate gyrus, all structures now strongly implicated in memory functions. An additional goal of this review is to describe the routes taken by the various connections within this network. The original descriptions of these limbic connections saw their interconnecting pathways forming a serial circuit that began and finished in the hippocampal formation. It is now clear that, with the exception of the mammillary bodies, these various sites are multiply interconnected with each other, including many reciprocal connections. In addition, these same connections are topographically organised, creating further subsystems. This complex pattern of connectivity helps to explain the difficulty of interpreting the functional outcome of damage to any individual site within the network. For these same reasons, Papez' initial concept of a loop beginning and ending in the hippocampal formation needs to be seen as a much more complex system of hippocampal-diencephalic-cingulate connections. The functions of these multiple interactions might be better viewed as principally providing efferent information from the posterior medial temporal lobe. Both a subcortical diencephalic route (via the fornix) and a cortical cingulate route (via retrosplenial cortex) can be distinguished. These routes provide indirect pathways for hippocampal interactions with prefrontal cortex, with the preponderance of both sets of connections arising from the more posterior hippocampal regions. These multi-stage connections complement the direct hippocampal projections to prefrontal cortex, which principally arise from the anterior hippocampus, thereby creating longitudinal functional differences along the anterior-posterior plane of the hippocampus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2398212817723443

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The retrosplenial cortex provides connections and receives connections from the hippocampal system, connecting especially with the parahippocampal gyrus areas TF and TH, and with the subiculum.

    “The retrosplenial cortex provides connections and receives connections from the hippocampal system, connecting especially with the parahippocampal gyrus areas TF and TH, and with the subiculum (Kobayashi and Amaral, 2003, 2007; Bubb et al., 2017).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Bubb et al., 2017

  • The posterior cingulate cortex is a region with strong connectivity in primates with the entorhinal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus (areas TF and TH), and thus with the hippocampal memory system.

    “The posterior cingulate cortex is a region with strong connectivity in primates with the entorhinal cortex and parahippocampal gyrus (areas TF and TH), and thus with the hippocampal memory system (Vogt, 2009; Bubb et al., 2017; Rolls and Wirth, 2018; Rolls, 2018b; 2019b,c, 2021a).”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Bubb et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 165 · Cited by 234

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vertes RP Linlkey SB Groenewegen HJ et al (2015) Thalamus. In: Paxinos G (ed.) The Rat Nervous System (4th edn). Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 335– 390.

Authors
Bubb, E. J., Kinnavane, L., & Aggleton, J. P.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kinnavane, Lisa
Venue
Brain and Neuroscience Advances
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
2398-2128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2727278441
Cited by
234
References
165
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 3
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Neuroscience Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (103722, 103722/Z/14/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
Papez circuit, limbic system, memory, emotions, mammillary bodies, anterior thalamic nuclei, cingulate gyrus, hippocampal formation, fornix, retrosplenial cortex, prefrontal cortex, hippocampal projections, neural tracing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review