Cited by 315Immune Response and InflammationSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The role of lipopolysaccharide-induced cell signalling in chronic inflammation

Open access
Page, Martin J., Kell, Douglas B., Pretorius, Etheresia·2022·Chronic Stress

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the main structural component of the outer membrane of most Gram-negative bacteria and has diverse immunostimulatory and procoagulant effects. Even though LPS is well described for its role in the pathology of sepsis, considerable evidence demonstrates that LPS-induced signalling and immune dysregulation are also relevant in the pathophysiology of many diseases, characteristically where endotoxaemia is less severe. These diseases are typically chronic and progressive in nature and span broad classifications, including neurodegenerative, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases. This Review reappraises the mechanisms of LPS-induced signalling and emphasises the crucial contribution of LPS to the pathology of multiple chronic diseases, beyond conventional sepsis. This perspective asserts that new ways of approaching chronic diseases by targeting LPS-driven pathways may be of therapeutic benefit in a wide range of chronic inflammatory conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/24705470221076390

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 180 · Cited by 315

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [68]Freudenberg MA Galanos C. Metabolism of LPS in vivo. In: Morrison DC Ryan JL (eds) Bacterial Endotoxic Lipopolysaccharides, Vol 2: Immunopharmacology and Pathophysiology. 275–294, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992.

Authors
Page, M. J., Kell, D. B., & Pretorius, E.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Pretorius, Etheresia
Venue
Chronic Stress
Published
2022-01
Volume
6
Pages
24705470221076390-24705470221076390
ISSN
2470-5470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210844311
Cited by
315
References
180
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 21
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chronic Stress (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF20CC0035580)
  • UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L025752/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MRC) of South Africa (Self-Initiated Research Program)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
lipopolysaccharide, endotoxemia, chronic inflammation, Gram-negative bacteria, immune dysregulation, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review