Applying Deep Neural Network Analysis to High-Content Image-Based Assays
Open accessAbstract
The etiological underpinnings of many CNS disorders are not well understood. This is likely due to the fact that individual diseases aggregate numerous pathological subtypes, each associated with a complex landscape of genetic risk factors. To overcome these challenges, researchers are integrating novel data types from numerous patients, including imaging studies capturing broadly applicable features from patient-derived materials. These datasets, when combined with machine learning, potentially hold the power to elucidate the subtle patterns that stratify patients by shared pathology. In this study, we interrogated whether high-content imaging of primary skin fibroblasts, using the Cell Painting method, could reveal disease-relevant information among patients. First, we showed that technical features such as batch/plate type, plate, and location within a plate lead to detectable nuisance signals, as revealed by a pre-trained deep neural network and analysis with deep image embeddings. Using a plate design and image acquisition strategy that accounts for these variables, we performed a pilot study with 12 healthy controls and 12 subjects affected by the severe genetic neurological disorder spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and evaluated whether a convolutional neural network (CNN) generated using a subset of the cells could distinguish disease states on cells from the remaining unseen control-SMA pair. Our results indicate that these two populations could effectively be differentiated from one another and that model selectivity is insensitive to batch/plate type. One caveat is that the samples were also largely separated by source. These findings lay a foundation for how to conduct future studies exploring diseases with more complex genetic contributions and unknown subtypes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automated image analysis, feature recognition, data extraction and deep learning models are everyday reality for the tech giants but have only partially reached precision pathology.
“Automated image analysis, feature recognition, data extraction and deep learning models are everyday reality for the tech giants but have only partially reached precision pathology (51–53).”
From Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation (2022) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Yang, S. J., Lipnick, S. L., Makhortova, N. R., Venugopalan, S., Fan, M., Armstrong, Z., Schlaeger, T. M., Deng, L., Chung, W. K., O’Callaghan, L., Geraschenko, A., Whye, D., Berndl, M., Hazard, J., Williams, B., Narayanaswamy, A., Ando, D. M., Nelson, P., & Rubin, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Samuel J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- SLAS DISCOVERY
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 829-841
- ISSN
- 2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6710615
- OpenAlex
- W2959350436
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01 NS066888)
- spinal muscular atrophy foundation
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute
- massachusetts general hospital (Center for Assessment Technology and Continuous Health)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
- Keywords
- spinal muscular atrophy, Cell Painting, high-content imaging, convolutional neural networks, batch effects, plate design, disease classification, genetic neurological disorders, patient stratification
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer, Molecular Imaging, High-Throughput Screening Assays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review