Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Responsibility, care and repair in/of AI: Extinction threats and more-than-real worlds

McLean, Jessica·2024·Environment and Planning F
DOI 10.1177/26349825241228586
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The recent statement of future (human) extinction by Artificial Intelligence (AI), made by the Center for AI Safety, crystallises techno-capitalists’ lack of care and responsibility for environmental and social harms that digital technologies already produce. Rather than identifying their collective roles and responsibilities in addressing these harms, the Center’s statement highlights future risks, and ties these to global extinction threats. There are, however, alternatives to such an approach, as articulated in research at the intersection of geographies of care and digital geographies, including that which is bringing together more-than-human and more-than-real approaches. While the software and hardware of AI continues to present amorphous challenges to the same techno-capitalists who benefit from them, we could instead prioritise care, repair and responsibility in/of AI to address current problems in this area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/26349825241228586

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Parikka J, 2014, The Anthrobscene
  3. Raghuram P (2016) Locating care ethics beyond the global north. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 15(3): 511–533. Available at: https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1353
  4. Wajcman J, 2004, Technofeminism

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
McLean, J.
Affiliations
Macquarie University, Australia
ORCID
McLean, Jessica
Venue
Environment and Planning F
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2024-02-09
Volume
3
Issue
1-2
Pages
3-16
ISSN
2634-9825
DOI
10.1177/26349825241228586
Cited by
15
References
54
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.