2022 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support
Abstract
Purpose: The National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) provide guidance and evidence-based, quality practice for all DSMES services. Due to the dynamic nature of health care and diabetes research, the National Standards are reviewed and revised approximately every 5 years by key stakeholders and experts within the diabetes care and education community. For each revision, the Task Force is charged with reviewing the current National Standards for appropriateness, relevance, and scientific basis and making updates based on current evidence and expert consensus. In 2021, the group was tasked with reducing administrative burden related to DSMES implementation across diverse care settings. Conclusion: The evidence supporting the 2022 National Standards clearly identifies the need to provide person-centered services that embrace cultural differences, social determinants of health, and the ever-increasing technological engagement platforms and systems. Payers are invited to review the National Standards as a tool to inform and modernize DSMES reimbursement requirements and to align with the evolving needs of people with diabetes (PWD) and physicians/other qualified health care professionals. The American Diabetes Association and the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists strongly advocate for health equity to ensure all PWD have access to this critical service proven to improve outcomes both related to and beyond diabetes. The 2022 National Standards update is meant to be a universal document that is easy to understand and can be implemented by the entire health care community. DSMES teams in collaboration with primary care have been shown to be the most effective approach to overcome therapeutic inertia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Remote diabetes self-management education and support provided via phone calls and telehealth may not always be reimbursed.
“However, although DSMES can also be provided via phone calls and telehealth, these remote versions may not always be reimbursed (13).”
From 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes:<i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Changes in reimbursement policies that increase diabetes self-management education and support access and utilization will result in a positive impact to beneficiaries' clinical outcomes, quality of life, health care utilization, and costs.
“Changes in reimbursement policies that increase DSMES access and utilization will result in a positive impact to beneficiaries' clinical outcomes, quality of life, health care utilization, and costs (13,(84)(85)(86).”
From 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes:<i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 120 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Davis, J., Fischl, A. H., Beck, J., Browning, L., Carter, A., Condon, J. E., Dennison, M., Francis, T., Hughes, P. J., Jaime, S., Lau, K. H. K., McArthur, T., McAvoy, K., Magee, M., Newby, O., Ponder, S. W., Quraishi, U., Rawlings, K., Socke, J., Stancil, M., Uelmen, S., & Villalobos, S.
- Affiliations
- Dignity Health (US)
- University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- SWLA Center for Health Services, Crowley, Louisiana
- Eskenazi Health (US)
- Anne Arundel Medical Center (US)
- Oklahoma City Indian Clinic, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
- San Diego City College (US)
- Samford University (US)
- El Centro Regional Medical Center, El Centro, California
- Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
- Cecelia Health, New York, New York
- Yale New Haven Health System (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- The Healthy Living Center Diabetes Education Program, Norfolk, Virginia
- Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
- American Diabetes Association (US)
- Vida Health, San Francisco, California
- Healthy Interactions, Chicago, Illinois
- Prisma Health (US)
- Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, Chicago, Illinois
- AdventHealth (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-01-20
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-59
- ISSN
- 0145-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 2635-0106
- 2635-0114
- OpenAlex
- W4206585801
- Semantic Scholar
- f8dd1d7e89ac264ecd7a86fbf87ca5fa11ea9757
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 24.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- american diabetes association
- Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- diabetes self-management education and support, national standards, quality standards, person-centred care, social determinants of health, health equity, administrative burden, reimbursement, therapeutic inertia, primary care collaboration, diabetic patients
- MeSH terms
- Self-Management, Delivery of Health Care, Diabetes Mellitus, Educational Status, Humans, Health Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review