The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of fixation and penetration enhancement techniques for use in ultrastructural immunocytochemistry.
Open accessAbstract
Electron microscopic immunohistochemistry, although generally providing good localization, has often failed to produce satisfying ultrastructural preservation. Techniques that result in well-preserved tissue ultrastructure often hinder penetration of immunological reagents or render antigens non-immunoreactive. These are particularly serious limitations in studies of central nervous system and retina. We have evaluated several fixatives, including picric acid, high pH paraformaldehyde, and glutaraldehyde with subsequent sodium borohydride treatment, and penetration enhancement techniques, including buffered-ethanolic treatment and freeze--thaw, for their applicability in the retina. Our best fixation was achieved with 1 hr in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde (pH 7.4) followed by overnight fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 10.4). Treatment with sodium borohydride after glutaraldehyde fixation restores much of the immunoreactivity that would otherwise be undetectable. The penetration of immunological reagents can be greatly increased by using either a buffered-ethanolic series or by freezing the tissue after careful cryoprotection. Using these methods we have been able to achieve specific immunological staining throughout the full thickness of retinal slices, up to 500 microns across, while preserving good ultrastructure. The methods should prove useful in the immunocytochemical localization of many different antigens in a variety of tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Solitary chemoreceptor cells in the nasal cavity serve as sentinels of respiration
Finger, T. E., Böttger, B., Hansen, A., Anderson, K. T., Alimohammadi, H., & Silver, W. L. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1531172100 · Cited by 414
Eckenstein, F., & Baughman, R. W. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/309153a0 · Cited by 356
Sakanaka, M., Shibasaki, T., & Lederis, K. (1986) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(86)91332-6 · Cited by 337
Hawkes, R., & Leclerc, N. (1987) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902560104 · Cited by 276
Carlsen, J. (1988) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902730407 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Eldred, W. D., Zucker, C., Karten, H. J., & Yazulla, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-292
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2145186246
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of fixation and penetration enhancement techniques for use in ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/31.2.6339606
- The paper
- Eldred, W. D., Zucker, C., Karten, H. J., & Yazulla, S. (1983). Comparison of fixation and penetration enhancement techniques for use in ultrastructural immunocytochemistry. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/31.2.6339606
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.