The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The histochemical profiles of fast fiber types IIB, IID, and IIA in skeletal muscles of mouse, rat, and rabbit.
Abstract
This study characterized histochemically three fast fiber types (IIB, IID, IIA) in skeletal muscles of mouse, rat, and rabbit, with special reference to fiber types IIB and IID. The results are complemented by biochemical analyses of myosin heavy chain composition in these muscles. Fiber type delineation is based on various methods for mATPase staining with pre-incubations and assays under different conditions. In rat and mouse, IIB and IID fibers can be best distinguished according to their different mATPase stabilities towards formaldehyde and alkaline pH. In rabbit, the method of Matoba and Gollnick using acid pre-incubation provided best and most reproducible results. In addition to their different mATPase stabilities, the three fast fiber types differ with regard to their oxidative capacities and cross-sectional fiber areas in the three species. In general, Type IIB fibers are the largest and least oxidative, Type IIA fibers the smallest and most oxidative, and Type IID fibers intermediate. In rabbit, Type IID fibers are the predominant fast fiber population in extensor digitorum longus, psoas, and tibialis anterior muscles. As judged from histochemistry, these muscles of rabbit do not contain pure Type IIB fibers. This is in accordance with biochemical results that show the HCIId to form the majority of the myosin heavy chain complement expressed in these muscles. On the other hand, IIB fibers are numerous in rabbit adductor magnus, gastrocnemius, and vastus lateralis muscles. Similarly, appreciable amounts of myosin heavy chain HCIIb are found in the three latter muscles of rabbit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sebastián, D., Sorianello, E., Segalés, J., Irazoki, A., Ruiz‐Bonilla, V., Sala, D., Planet, E., Berenguer‐Llergo, A., Muñoz, J. P., Sánchez‐Feutrie, M., et al. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201593084 · Cited by 396
Prado, L. G., Makarenko, I., Andresen, C., Krüger, M., Opitz, C. A., & Linke, W. A. (2005) · The Journal of General Physiology · doi:10.1085/jgp.200509364 · Cited by 363
Hegedus, J., Putman, C. T., & Gordon, T. (2007) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2007.07.003 · Cited by 321
MacArthur, D. G., Seto, J. T., Chan, S., Quinlan, K. G. R., Raftery, J. M., Turner, N., Nicholson, M. D., Kee, A. J., Hardeman, E. C., Gunning, P. W., et al. (2008) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm380 · Cited by 287
Shortreed, K. E., Krause, M. P., Huang, J. H., Dhanani, D., Moradi, J., Ceddia, R. B., & Hawke, T. J. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007293 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Hämäläinen, N., & Pette, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 733-743
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2035540931
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The histochemical profiles of fast fiber types IIB, IID, and IIA in skeletal muscles of mouse, rat, and rabbit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/41.5.8468455
- The paper
- Hämäläinen, N., & Pette, D. (1993). The histochemical profiles of fast fiber types IIB, IID, and IIA in skeletal muscles of mouse, rat, and rabbit. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/41.5.8468455
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.