Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations.

Open access
Negoescu, A, Lorimier, P, Labat-Moleur, F, Drouet, C, Robert, C, Guillermet, C, Brambilla, C, Brambilla, E·1996·Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Abstract

TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling) is a method of choice for rapid identification and quantification of the apoptotic cell fraction in cultured cell preparations. However, TUNEL application has been restricted to a narrow spectrum of sample conditions, and only detergents have been proposed as labeling enhancers. This study was aimed at extending TUNEL to variously fixed cells and improving TUNEL sensitivity by optimized pretreatments, the specificity being assessed by reference to the apoptotic morphology. Comparative TUNEL was performed with three protocols on CEM-C7 cells, a model of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. Samples were submitted to six modalities of fixation and TUNEL was performed after each of the following conditions: no pretreatment; detergent permeabilization; proteolytic digestion; microwave irradiation; and a recently published combination of the latter two. The proportion of TUNEL-stained elements within the cell fraction, with and without apoptotic morphology, was quantified. Our results showed that: (a) with an adequate pretreatment, reliable TUNEL can be obtained after each fixative tested; (b) detergent was inefficient in improving sensitivity; (c) whatever the fixation, microwave pretreatment provided the best TUNEL sensitivity without notable loss of specificity; (d) under adaptive technical conditions, TUNEL can be associated with detection of various proteins by double labeling; and (e) the existence of a limited population of intensely TUNEL-positive cells that lacked apoptotic morphology contributes to the current debate about a preapoptotic state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/44.9.8773561

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Negoescu, A., Lorimier, P., Labat-Moleur, F., Drouet, C., Robert, C., Guillermet, C., Brambilla, C., & Brambilla, E.
Venue
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
Published
1996-09
Volume
44
Issue
9
Pages
959-968
ISSN
  • 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-5044
OpenAlex
W2069915122
Cited by
367
References
0
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/44.9.8773561
The paper
Negoescu, A., Lorimier, P., Labat-Moleur, F., Drouet, C., Robert, C., Guillermet, C., Brambilla, C., & Brambilla, E. (1996). In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/44.9.8773561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.