The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations.
Open accessAbstract
TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling) is a method of choice for rapid identification and quantification of the apoptotic cell fraction in cultured cell preparations. However, TUNEL application has been restricted to a narrow spectrum of sample conditions, and only detergents have been proposed as labeling enhancers. This study was aimed at extending TUNEL to variously fixed cells and improving TUNEL sensitivity by optimized pretreatments, the specificity being assessed by reference to the apoptotic morphology. Comparative TUNEL was performed with three protocols on CEM-C7 cells, a model of glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis. Samples were submitted to six modalities of fixation and TUNEL was performed after each of the following conditions: no pretreatment; detergent permeabilization; proteolytic digestion; microwave irradiation; and a recently published combination of the latter two. The proportion of TUNEL-stained elements within the cell fraction, with and without apoptotic morphology, was quantified. Our results showed that: (a) with an adequate pretreatment, reliable TUNEL can be obtained after each fixative tested; (b) detergent was inefficient in improving sensitivity; (c) whatever the fixation, microwave pretreatment provided the best TUNEL sensitivity without notable loss of specificity; (d) under adaptive technical conditions, TUNEL can be associated with detection of various proteins by double labeling; and (e) the existence of a limited population of intensely TUNEL-positive cells that lacked apoptotic morphology contributes to the current debate about a preapoptotic state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fridman, G., Shereshevsky, A., Jost, M. M., Brooks, A. D., Fridman, A., Gutsol, A., Vasilets, V., & Friedman, G. (2007) · Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing · doi:10.1007/s11090-007-9048-4 · Cited by 594
Detection of Apoptosis by TUNEL Assay
Kyrylkova, K., Kyryachenko, S., Leid, M., & Kioussi, C. (2012) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-860-3_5 · Cited by 510
Distinct mechanisms underlie neurotoxin-mediated cell death in cultured dopaminergic neurons
Lotharius, J., Dugan, L. L., & O’Malley, K. L. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-04-01284.1999 · Cited by 403
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce emphysema‐like lung injury in mice
Chen, H., Su, S., Chien, C., Lin, W., Yu, S., Chou, C., Chen, J. J. W., Yang, P., Chen, H., Su, S., et al. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.06-6485fje · Cited by 310
Entosis Allows Timely Elimination of the Luminal Epithelial Barrier for Embryo Implantation
Li, Y., Sun, X., & Dey, S. K. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.035 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Negoescu, A., Lorimier, P., Labat-Moleur, F., Drouet, C., Robert, C., Guillermet, C., Brambilla, C., & Brambilla, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 959-968
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2069915122
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/44.9.8773561
- The paper
- Negoescu, A., Lorimier, P., Labat-Moleur, F., Drouet, C., Robert, C., Guillermet, C., Brambilla, C., & Brambilla, E. (1996). In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/44.9.8773561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.