Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A CORRELATIVE STUDY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RODENT ACID MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDES

SPICER, S. S.·1960·Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Abstract

The staining properties of several rodent mucopolysaccharides with alcian blue and with azure A at controlled pH have been surveyed and compared with available radioautographic data of S 35 O 4 incorporation in mucins. The effects of treatment with acid methanol and of sulfation on the staining have been determined. One sulfated, metachromatic and strongly acid type of mucin stains weakly if at all with alcian blue, remaining unstained by alcian blue in the combined alcian blue periodic acid Schiff or alcian blue-azure A (or safranin) procedures, but loses azurophilia while gaining alcian blue reactivity after mild (4 hr 37°) treatment with acid methanol. Some (probably) sulfated mucins stain fully with both dyes and others, presumably also sulfated, color only partially with azure A at pH 1.5, but maximally with alcian blue. The latter two types of substances partially or completely resist supression of either staining reaction by the "mild methylation". A fourth category stains meta- or orthochromatically at pH 2.5 to 3, or not at all, with azure A, and colors strongly with alcian blue. Some of the latter mucins are sulfated and remain unaltered after mild treatment with acid methanol, whereas others appear to be nonsulfated and lose basophilia reversibly with such treatment. It is suggested that alcian blue staining and metachromasia or orthochromasia with azure A above pH 2.5 which is blocked after 4 hours in acid methanol at 37°C and restored by brief saponification, may be attributed to nonsulfated mucopolysaccharides containing strongly acidic carboxyls. A four hour acidic methylation at 69° eliminates nearly all the basophilia of acid mucins, and saponification restores alcian blue staining to some, but not azurophilia below pH 3.0. Sulfation of histologic sections renders many neutral and all acid mucins fully chromotropic toward azure A at pH 1.5, but obstructs their alcian blue staining. Exposure to acid methanol after sulfation restores reactivity toward alcian blue and eliminates most artificial azurophilia; but the neutral mucins in Brunner's glands and mucous neck cells of rats and mice remain metachromatic and develop alcian blue affinity. Strong treatment with acid methanol increases the periodic acid Schiff staining of several subfated mucopolysaccharides of the rabbit. Staining with azure A or safranin after alcian blue differentiates alcian blue-negative and -positive sulfated polysaccharides. Failure of sulfate-free acid mucins to stain with alcian blue above the pH of their dissociation and resistance of the dye complex with these mucins to dissolution by acid or alkali is interpreted as evidence against the alcian blue-substrate complex involving a salt linkage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/8.1.18

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
SPICER, S. S.
Venue
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
Published
1960-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
18-35
ISSN
  • 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-5044
OpenAlex
W1982345201
Cited by
468
References
0
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A CORRELATIVE STUDY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RODENT ACID MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/8.1.18
The paper
SPICER, S. S. (1960). A CORRELATIVE STUDY OF THE HISTOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF RODENT ACID MUCOPOLYSACCHARIDES. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/8.1.18

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.