Cited by 9biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer Foaming and Composites

Blown film stability for low, medium, and high molecular weight polylactic acid and their tensile properties

Licea-Saucedo, Daniel C, Rodrigue, Denis, Cisneros-López, Erick O, González-Núñez, Rubén·2023·Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting

Abstract

Three poly (lactic acid) (PLA) resins with molecular weight (Mw) equal to 55 (3251D), 125 (L105) and 163 (LX175) kg/mol were characterized in terms of capillary viscosity, mechanical and thermal properties and used to produce blown films. The effect of temperature, extrusion rate, stretching (TUR) and blow-up (BUR) ratios were evaluated to determine the optimum processing conditions for blown films based on the bubble stability and to determine their final tensile properties. As expected, the processing temperature was the most critical parameter on the film stability. The lower Mw PLA showed limited processing stability. Stable conditions were found at higher temperature (200°C) for higher Mw. These results correlate with the PLA viscosity (melt strength). Finally, the PLA film tensile strength (TS) strongly depended on their processability. For example, 3251D and L105 required high stretching (TUR = 3.4 and 7) for maximum TS (30 and 64 MPa) with a low blow-up ratio (BUR = 1.02–1.15). However, a moderate increase in BUR (10% at TUR = 3) led to a substantial drop in TS (from 29 MPa to 21 MPa for PLA 3251D and 44 MPa–34 MPa for L105). Overall, LX175 was the most interesting resin with 49 MPa TS which was independent of the BUR and TUR used in this investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/87560879231153702

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Licea-Saucedo, D. C., Rodrigue, D., Cisneros-López, E. O., & González-Núñez, R.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Química, CUCEI, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting
Published
2023-01-30
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
321-343
ISSN
  • 1530-8014 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-0879
OpenAlex
W4318483273
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidad de Guadalajara (UdG-Prosni Grant # 265361)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
Keywords
polylactic acid, blown film, molecular weight, bubble stability, tensile strength, melt strength, processing temperature, extrusion speed, draw ratio, blow-up ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review