Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Imagining Women's 'Legal World': Towards a Feminist Theory of Legal Pluralism in Africa

Manji, Ambreena S·1999·Social & Legal Studies
DOI 10.1177/a010357
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article argues that most feminist legal theory has been located within a dominant and phallocentric legal centralist paradigm and that this has hindered feminism's engagement with legal pluralism. I will argue that theoretical work which privileges state law can at best furnish us with only partial accounts of women's experiences of law. Articulating a feminine view of the (legal) world requires an engagement with legal pluralism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/a010357

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 53

Related

Metadata

Authors
Manji, A. S.
Affiliations
Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Manji, Ambreena S
ORCID
Manji, Ambreena S
Venue
Social & Legal Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1999-12-01
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
435-455
ISSN
  • 0964-6639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7390
DOI
10.1177/a010357
OpenAlex
W2266800124
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Social & Legal Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
feminist legal theory, legal pluralism, state law, African law, women's rights, gender and law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.