The Ecological Interpretation of Ancient Charcoals from Jericho
Abstract
(1971). The Ecological Interpretation of Ancient Charcoals from Jericho. Levant: Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 31-40.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tamarisk is the predominant wood type of charcoal found on the tell; it is also the most common present-day shrub or small tree in the area.
“Tamarisk is the predominant wood type of charcoal found on the tell; it is also the most common present-day shrub or small tree in the area (Western 1971; Hopf 1983).”
From Tell Es-Sultan (Jericho): Radiocarbon Results of Short-Lived Cereal and Multiyear Charcoal Samples from the End of the Middle Bronze Age (1995) · cites this paper as Western 1971
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 46
- Authors
- Cecilia Western, A.
- Venue
- Levant
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1971-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-40
- ISSN
- 0075-8914 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-3801
- OpenAlex
- W2034491560
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Levant (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Keywords
- ecological interpretation, Jericho, paleoecology, charcoal analysis, environmental reconstruction, Neolithic, Bronze Age
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
