Cited by 78Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Expression of amyloid precursor protein after rat traumatic brain injury

Itoh, Tatsuki, Satou, Takao, Nishida, Shozo, Tsubaki, Masahiro, Hashimoto, Shigeo, Ito, Hiroyuki·2009·Neurological Research

Abstract

Objective Previous reports have demonstrated that some focal brain injuries increase amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunoreactivity in the region surrounding the injury in the cerebral cortex. However, the chronologic changes in APP expression have not been evaluated after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods In this study, we immunohistochemically and biologically investigated chronologic changes in cellular sources and levels of APP production after rat TBI. Results In the present report, we show that traumatic brain injury increased the expression of APP in the neuronal perikarya and in damaged dystrophic neurites from 1 to 90 days after injury. Moreover, 7 days after injury, some macrophages/microglia also were co-localized with APP, which was overproduced by the neuronal perikarya and APP-positive dystrophic neurites after injury and then APP were phagocytosed by macrophages/microglia during this phase. However, astroglia did not express APP immunopositivity after brain injury. Discussion These results suggested that long-term overexpression of APP was confirmed by immunohistochemical and biologic technique after TBI. This may be related to the induction of Alzheimer type dementia and it is a very important risk factor for this disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/016164108x323771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many animal studies show increased production and accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP), Aβ, and pathological tau following TBI.

    “Second, many animal studies show increased production and accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP), Aβ, and pathological tau following TBI (16, 21–28).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 78

Authors
Itoh, T., Satou, T., Nishida, S., Tsubaki, M., Hashimoto, S., & Ito, H.
Affiliations
  • Kindai University (JP)
  • Kindai University Hospital (JP)
  • PL Hospital (JP)
Venue
Neurological Research
Published
2009-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
103-109
ISSN
  • 0161-6412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-1328
OpenAlex
W1966483086
Cited by
78
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
amyloid precursor protein, traumatic brain injury, APP expression, neuronal perikarya, dystrophic neurites, microglia, macrophages, astrocytes, Alzheimer's disease risk
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Immunohistochemistry, Male, RNA, Messenger, Gene Expression, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Rats, Wistar, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review