Cited by 25Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Historical Studies

The relative chronology of Khirbet Qeiyafa.

Singer-Avitz, Lily·2010·Tel Aviv

Abstract

The pottery unearthed in the Iron Age settlement at Khirbet Qeiyafa has been dated by the excavators to the early iron IIA period. They further state that the site provides the best example of early iron IIA pottery in Judah and southern Israel (Kang and Garfinkel 2009a). The paper shows that the assemblage belongs to the late iron I horizon in southern Israel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/033443510x12632070179540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer-Avitz, L.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Singer-Avitz, Lily
Venue
Tel Aviv
Published
2010-06
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
79-83
ISSN
  • 0334-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-4786
OpenAlex
W2053091711
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
64.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tel Aviv (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
Keywords
Khirbet Qeiyafa, Iron Age pottery, chronology, Judah, southern Israel, Iron Age settlement, ceramic dating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review