The kingdom of Judah in the 9th century BCE: text analysis versus archaeological research
Abstract
The article discusses the growth of the Kingdom of Judah in the 9th century BCE in light of documentary and archaeological evidence. I suggest that the chronistic short accounts immersed in the Book of Kings should be used as anchors for the historical reconstruction, and that the results of the archaeological research should be integrated accordingly. Contrary to common opinion, during the Omride dynasty Judah remained an independent kingdom and it was free to pursue autonomous policies (provided that these did not clash with the interests of its strong northern neighbour). Already in the first half of the 9th century BCE, under Jehoshaphat and Jehoram, Judah began expanding to the Negev, the Arabah and Shephelah. The kings of Judah settled the Beer-sheba Valley, fortified Tel Beer-sheba (Stratum V) and Arad (Stratum XI) and made efforts to overtake the copper trade in order to share in its profits. In the west, they settled the easternmost Shephelah district, and around the mid-9th century BCE they fortified the city of Lachish (Level IV) as its administrative centre. Throughout the 9th century BCE, Judah maintained peaceful relations with the Kingdom of Gath, and the settlement of the eastern Shephelah may have developed as a result of an agreement between the two kingdoms. The subordination to Hazael brought Judah’s military operations to a halt, but following Adad-nerari III’s campaigns and Aram’s defeat, Amaziah resumed the Judahite offensive on the kingdom’s southern a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most logical historical reconstruction based on archaeological remains and 14C dates is the westward expansion of a nascent Judah already in the 10th century BC.
“The Tandy excavation directors consider that the most logical historical reconstruction based on the archaeological remains and 14C dates is the westward expansion of a nascent Judah already in the 10th century BC (cf. [174] and [175] which confine Judah’s expansion to the 9th century BC).”
From The chronology of Gezer from the end of the late bronze age to iron age II: A meeting point for radiocarbon, archaeology egyptology and the Bible (2023) · cites this paper as [175]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- NA'AMAN, N.
- Venue
- Tel Aviv
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-276
- ISSN
- 0334-4355 (ISSN-L)
- 2040-4786
- OpenAlex
- W2017806882
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 21.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tel Aviv (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- Kingdom of Judah, 9th century BCE, Jehoshaphat, Jehoram, Hazael, Aram, Gath, copper trade, Arad, Lachish, Shephelah, Negev, Book of Kings, historical reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review