Cited by 31Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryArchaeology and Historical Studies

The kingdom of Judah in the 9th century BCE: text analysis versus archaeological research

NA'AMAN, NADAV·2013·Tel Aviv

Abstract

The article discusses the growth of the Kingdom of Judah in the 9th century BCE in light of documentary and archaeological evidence. I suggest that the chronistic short accounts immersed in the Book of Kings should be used as anchors for the historical reconstruction, and that the results of the archaeological research should be integrated accordingly. Contrary to common opinion, during the Omride dynasty Judah remained an independent kingdom and it was free to pursue autonomous policies (provided that these did not clash with the interests of its strong northern neighbour). Already in the first half of the 9th century BCE, under Jehoshaphat and Jehoram, Judah began expanding to the Negev, the Arabah and Shephelah. The kings of Judah settled the Beer-sheba Valley, fortified Tel Beer-sheba (Stratum V) and Arad (Stratum XI) and made efforts to overtake the copper trade in order to share in its profits. In the west, they settled the easternmost Shephelah district, and around the mid-9th century BCE they fortified the city of Lachish (Level IV) as its administrative centre. Throughout the 9th century BCE, Judah maintained peaceful relations with the Kingdom of Gath, and the settlement of the eastern Shephelah may have developed as a result of an agreement between the two kingdoms. The subordination to Hazael brought Judah’s military operations to a halt, but following Adad-nerari III’s campaigns and Aram’s defeat, Amaziah resumed the Judahite offensive on the kingdom’s southern a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/033443513x13753505864331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 31

Authors
NA'AMAN, N.
Venue
Tel Aviv
Published
2013-11
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
247-276
ISSN
  • 0334-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-4786
OpenAlex
W2017806882
Cited by
31
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tel Aviv (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
Keywords
Kingdom of Judah, 9th century BCE, Jehoshaphat, Jehoram, Hazael, Aram, Gath, copper trade, Arad, Lachish, Shephelah, Negev, Book of Kings, historical reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review