Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fracture toughness testing of brittle materials

Sakai, M., Bradt, R. C.·1993·International Materials Reviews

Abstract

Research within the past two decades has achieved a dramatic upsurge of improvements in the mechanical properties of engineering ceramics. These improvements have often been made through increased toughness by novel toughening mechanisms such as the stress induced phase transformation, microcracking, fibre/whisker crack bridging, etc. These may occur not only in the frontal process zone ahead of a sharp crack, but also in the following crack wake region. The consequences of these microfracture processes and mechanisms in the wake and the crack bridging regions are significant, for they result in very complex fracture processes and they create many critical issues and difficulties in the experimental determination of the fracture resistance of brittle materials. The lack of a physical basis for a fracture criterion in the present fracture mechanics framework adds further confusion to fracture mechanics studies. This paper is a state of the art review of the application of fracture mechanics to brittle ceramics and ceramic composites for the determination of the fracture resistance. The details of various experimental techniques are addressed. Included are a wide variety of specimen geometries, as well as crack dimensions from large macrocracks or macronotches to indentation induced microflaws. The effects of R-curve behaviour and various toughening processes on the fracture toughness have been carefully considered. It is emphasised that ‘fracture physics considerations’ are very important for understanding the influence of the test conditions on the experimentally determined fracture resistance values of brittle materials with various microscopic toughening processes and mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/095066093790101734

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Sakai, M., & Bradt, R. C.
Venue
International Materials Reviews
Published
1993-01-01
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
53-78
ISSN
  • 0950-6608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-2804
OpenAlex
W1968683647
Cited by
233
References
1
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fracture toughness testing of brittle materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1179/095066093790101734
The paper
Sakai, M., & Bradt, R. C. (1993). Fracture toughness testing of brittle materials. International Materials Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1179/095066093790101734

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.