Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Education and Professionalization for Heritage Conservation in the Arab Region: Review of Current Status and Strategic Directions

Aslan, Zaki·2014·Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites

Abstract

This paper discusses strategic needs for professional education programmes as a means for the protection of tangible cultural heritage assets in the Arab Region, with special reference to the Gulf States. Based on analyses of the state of conservation of heritage properties, rigorous needs assessments, stakeholders’ meetings conducted by inter-governmental organizations, and ongoing regional programmes, the paper offers an overview of the status quo and strategic directions for professionalization in this field. The paper argues that a comprehensive understanding is crucial for the sustainability of existing and emerging educational programmes and initiatives, particularly, in this part of the world.Advancing heritage conservation in the Arab region is related to the limitations of available professional skills and guidance for the various levels of heritage conservation and management. In addition, there is insufficient general public awareness in relation to cultural heritage issues in the greate­r area. This limitation is primarily driven by the inadequate definition of subject areas that respond to conservation training or educational priority needs at training and higher education institutions, which have emerged in the last decade. It is therefore important to enhance clarity in effective training requirements and education methods at various levels, and to encourage interdisciplinary conservation work in the training and education processes

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/1350503314z.00000000077

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Arab regions of the world the most prominent obstacle for heritage preservation is a lack of trained and qualified individuals, and a lack of skills in the application of internationally accepted principles and knowledge.

    “In the Arab regions of the world the most prominent obstacle for heritage preservation is a lack of trained and qualified individuals, and a lack of skills in the application of internationally accepted principles and knowledge.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ardemagni M., 2013, Selected Readings from ATHAR: Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Arab Region, Issues in the Conservation and Management of Heritage Sites, 133
  2. Aslan Z., 2005, ICCROM Newsletter, 31, 12
  3. Aslan Z., 2013, Selected Readings from ATHAR: Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Arab Region, Issues in the Conservation and Management of Heritage Sites., 11
  4. ECCO, 2002, E.C.C.O. Professional Guidelines: The Profession (European Confederation of Conservator- Restorers’ Organizations) [online] [accessed July 2013].
  5. ICOMOS, 1993, Guidelines for Education and Training in the Conservation of Monuments, Ensembles and Sites [online] [accessed July 2013].
  6. ICOMOS, 1994, The Nara Document on Authenticity
  7. 10.1080/13556207.2002.10785327 · DOI
  8. Mahdy H., 2013, Selected Readings from ATHAR: Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Arab Region, Issues in the Conservation and Management of Heritage Sites., 47
  9. Mazzeo R., 2007, Conservation Science 2007, 15
  10. No author., 2010, L’Orient-Le Jour
  11. UNDP, 2006, Capacity Development Practice Note [online] [accessed July 2013].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aslan, Z.
Venue
Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites
Published
2014-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
117-130
ISSN
  • 1350-5033
  • 1753-5522
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review