The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-Based Rehabilitation for Developing Speech and Language in Hearing-Impaired Children: A Systematic Review
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine whether online or computer-based technologies were effective in assisting the development of speech and language skills in children with hearing loss. Relevant studies of children with hearing loss were analysed with reference to (1) therapy outcomes, (2) factors affecting outcomes, and (3) publication and methodological quality. The study quality was assessed using the 11-point PEDro scale. The review identified ten studies of relevance to the question of interest. All studies had relatively low PEDro quality scores with only four studies scoring in the mid-range on the scale. For these four studies, computer-based training appeared favourable at the group level. However, the small number of studies found significantly limits the generalizations and indicates the usage of these technologies in this population as an area requiring further rigorous research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The second obstacle is that existing systems generally lack sufficient technical description of the details underlying their development.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Simpson et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“The overall methodological quality of research is moderate to low for computerized speech and language interventions, including for systems targeting adults and children with normal and atypical hearing (Y.-P.P. Chen et al., 2016;Furlong et al., 2017;Simpson et al., 2015).”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Simpson et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Helping Patients Follow Prescribed Treatment: Clinical Applications
Haynes, R. B., McDonald, H. P., & Garg, A. X. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2880 · Cited by 98 · cited 1×
“Similar difficulties in non-compliance have been reported across the medical and allied health fields (e.g. Haynes et al., 2002; Olthoff et al., 2005).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Access Economics, 2006, The Economic Impact and Cost of Hearing Loss in Australia
- 10.1016/0167-6393(91)90007-G · DOI
- 10.3109/02699206.2011.618236 · DOI
- 10.1093/deafed/eng002 · DOI
- 10.3109/14992027.2012.664291 · DOI
- Blobaum P., 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94, 477
- Bronus K., 2011, Global Journal of Health Sciences, 3, 49
- CAHE Review Team, 2009, A Systematic Review of the Literature on Early Intervention for Children with Permanent Hearing Loss
- 10.3109/17549500903577022 · DOI
- 10.1258/jtt.2012.111208 · DOI
- 10.3109/13682820903470569 · DOI
- 10.1080/13670050.2012.758686 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2004-815584 · DOI
- Dollaghan C., 2007, The Handbook for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders
- Franck K., 2006, Volta Voices, 13, 16
- 10.1044/1059-0889(2003/011) · DOI
- 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/006) · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.e1119 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa054915 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022215106001319 · DOI
- 10.1258/135763307781458912 · DOI
- 10.1258/jtt.2007.070612 · DOI
- 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/07-0008) · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0002 · DOI
- Lidström H., 2014, Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 251
- Maher C.G., 2003, Physical Therapy, 83, 713, 10.1093/ptj/83.8.713 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/025) · DOI
- Mayne A.M., 1998, Volta Review, 100, 1
- 10.1093/sw/47.2.153 · DOI
- 10.1111/1460-6984.12007 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.279.14.1071 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11845-013-0924-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.035 · DOI
- Osberger M., 1981, Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiologists, 14, 145
- 10.1044/jshr.3605.1063 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1471 · DOI
- Sackett D., 2000, Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
- 10.1007/3-540-58476-5_152 · DOI
- 10.3109/14992020903397838 · DOI
- 10.3766/jaaa.21.9.4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00574.x · DOI
- 10.1258/135763306779380048 · DOI
- 10.1159/000103211 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-6393(99)00039-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benway, N. R., & Preston, J. L. (2025) · Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2025_lshss-24-00085 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpson, A., El-Refaie, A., Stephenson, C., Chen, Y.-P. P., Deng, D., Erickson, S., Tay, D., Morris, M. E., Doube, W., & Caelli, T.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Data61 (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Morris, Meg E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Deafness & Education International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-10-28
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-119
- ISSN
- 1464-3154 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-069X
- OpenAlex
- W2081370411
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Deafness & Education International (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- computer-based rehabilitation, speech and language development, hearing-impaired children, hearing loss, online therapy, augmentative and alternative communication, treatment outcomes, methodological quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
