Differentiation of HT22 neurons induces expression of NMDA receptor that mediates homocysteine cytotoxicity
Abstract
Introduction Neurotoxic homocysteine (Hcy) is thought to be an independent risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. This study is to determine whether HT22 cells, a murine hippocampal neuronal model, can be used as an in vitro model, besides the primary neuronal cultures, to investigate the effects of Hcy. Materials and methods MTS assay and Hoechst 33342/propidium iodide discrimination were used to assess the cell viability and cell death on undifferentiated and differentiated HT22 cells. Semi-quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blot were used to determine the expression of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Results We found that undifferentiated and differentiated HT22 cells responded to Hcy toxicity differentially, with the undifferentiated cells resistant while the differentiated cells sensitive. The underlying mechanism appeared to be the differential expression levels of NMDA glutamate receptor between the undifferentiated and differentiated cells. Similar to what have been observed in primary neuronal cultures, the Hcy toxicity in the differentiated HT22 cells was largely attenuated by NMDA receptor antagonists, MK-801 and memantine. Conclusion These results suggest for the first time that the differentiation of HT22 cells could induce the expression of NMDA receptors, which lead to Hcy mediate concentration-dependent apoptosis-necrotic continuum of HT22 cell death. The differentiation status of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differentiated HT22 cells express higher levels of NMDAR mRNA, making them susceptible to glutamate-induced excitotoxicity.
“Differentiated HT22 cells express higher levels of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) mRNA [27], making them susceptible to glutamate-induced excitotoxicity [26].”
From Shared and distinct microRNA profiles between HT22, N2A and SH-SY5Y cell lines and primary mouse hippocampal neurons (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, R., Villegas-Salmerón, J., Sanz-Rodriguez, A., Engel, T., Mooney, C., Henshall, D. C., & Jimenez-Mateos, E. M. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326401 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., Lu, R., Zhang, B., Shen, J., Yang, L., Xiao, S., Liu, J., & Suo, W. Z.
- Affiliations
- Department of NeurologyDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of RadiologySun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Laboratory for Alzheimer’s Disease and Aging ResearchVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
- Venue
- Neurological Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-43
- ISSN
- 0161-6412
- 1743-1328
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review