Cited by 21Water Quality and Resources StudiesGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryGeology and Environmental Impact Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Evaporites and brines – geological, hydrological and chemical aspects of resource estimation

Border, S., Sawyer, L.·2014·Applied Earth Science

Abstract

Modern salt lakes are complex systems which are exploited for a variety of minerals, including solid and dissolved phases (brines). Phases commonly exploited include lithium, potassium and boron minerals, mainly from brines, and solid minerals including halite and gypsum. Resource estimation and successful exploitation of either solid minerals or brines require good understanding of the complex interactions within these systems. This includes careful definition of climate, geology, hydrogeology (hydrology), fluid flow dynamics and lastly chemical ion concentrations. Therefore estimation involves multidisciplinary team work. Brines are mobile resources which change through time, sometimes seasonally, so estimators must understand the climatic, hydrological and geological factors governing flows of both water and salts into and out of the system. Commercial extraction of brines involves brine collection (usually by pumping from wells) at rates that make the extraction economic, so brine resources should include only extractable brines, which are those in accessible aquifers available for pumping. Estimators must take into account potential limits on sustainable extraction rates when assessing the prospects for eventual economic extraction to determine whether a resource is present. Drilling on salt lakes can present significant challenges in safe access, and in recovery of uncontaminated samples of host rocks, which are often unconsolidated, and of brines. The merits of various…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/1743275814y.0000000053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1007/BF00025191 · DOI
  2. 10.2113/econgeo.106.7.1225 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Orris G. 2011. Deposit model for closed basin potash bearing brines, USGS open file report 2011–1283. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Border, S., & Sawyer, L.
Corresponding author
Border, S.
Venue
Applied Earth Science
Published
2014-06
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
95-106
ISSN
  • 0371-7453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-2758
OpenAlex
W2034936575
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Earth Science Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy Section B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
evaporites, saline lakes, brine, resource estimation, lithium, potassium, boron, halite, gypsum, hydrogeology, pumping tests, drilling challenges, evaporation, chemical separation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review