Cited by 59Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last?

Open access
Hegedus, Eric J, Goode, Adam, Butler, Robert J, Slaven, Emily·2011·Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy

Abstract

Studies detailing the neurophysiological effects of spinal manual therapy have fueled a paradigm shift away from a strict biomechanical model. However, a recent systematic review of the temporal nature of a single session of spinal thrust manipulation found that the neurophysiological effects were only temporary. The objective of this review was to examine the temporal nature of neurophysiological effects after one session of spinal mobilization. Studies eligible for this review had to report on the temporal component of the neurophysiological effects of a single session of joint mobilization of the spine in human subjects. In order to be sure that the temporal nature of these effects was captured, the studies had to monitor neurophysiological effects for a time beyond the immediate post-treatment period. This systematic review followed the methodology for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In order to assess the quality, strength, and importance of the included studies, the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation system was used. Results of this review showed that the neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal mobilization are mostly 5 minutes or less. An exception to these findings is hypoalgesia which may last up to 24 hours, based on one study. Continued research on small samples of healthy subjects with irrelevant immediate outcomes like salivary rate, skin conductance, and skin temperature should g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2042618611y.0000000003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hegedus, E. J., Goode, A., Butler, R. J., & Slaven, E.
Affiliations
  • High Point University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Hegedus, Eric J
Venue
Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
Published
2011-08
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
143-151
ISSN
  • 1066-9817 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6186
OpenAlex
W2043094616
Cited by
59
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
neurophysiological effects, spinal manipulation, hypoalgesia, manual therapy, post-treatment outcomes, skin conductance, skin temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review