Manuscript Writing
Abstract
Abstracts may be the most important part of a manuscript because they are often the only part that is read and used as an information source, and because they are also used by readers and editors t...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A notable issue in poster preparation is the lack of formal training in communication and visualization of research.
“In addition, a notable issue in poster preparation is the lack of formal training in communication and visualization of research with respect to different types of communication styles (scientific paper, news article, web pages, posters, etc.) [17-19].”
From What Makes a Good Poster? Evaluating #BetterPoster and Classic Formats at a Scientific Cancer Conference (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bentsen, L., & Østergaard, D. E. (2026) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-025-02622-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leventhal, P., & Reeves, A.
- Corresponding author
- Leventhal, Phillip
- Venue
- Medical Writing
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314-316
- ISSN
- 2047-4806 (ISSN-L)
- 2047-4814
- OpenAlex
- W4250698271
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- manuscript preparation, abstracts, scientific writing, manuscript structure, scholarly publishing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
