The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skills for the Future: An Introduction to the Community Archaeology Bursaries Project
Abstract
The Community Archaeology Bursaries Project is a three-year project managed by the Council for British Archaeology (CBA) and funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) through the Skills for the Future programme with additional support from English Heritage, the Welsh Government (Cadw) and Historic Scotland. The project was designed to meet an identified skills shortage in the heritage sector and is providing work-based training opportunities to equip would-be Community Archaeologists with the skills, experience and confidence to work with voluntary groups and communities. This brief paper provides an overview of the project, with particular focus on the structure of workplace learning and good practice in Professional Development Planning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There was a strong consensus across the working-conference sessions about the importance of 'soft skills' when working in AHM as well as transferable skills, such as participatory skills, communication, project management, financing and budgeting, marketing, active listening skills, knowledge about legal and administrative frameworks, mediation, and political and diplomatic skills (see also Sutcl”
From Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms (2018) · cites this paper as Sutcliffe 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Aitchison, Kenneth. 2009. “Professional Engagement with Community Archaeology: Stopgap or Transformation?” Unpublished presentation at The 15th Annual Conference of the European Association of Archaeologists, Centro Congresso, Riva del Garda, Italy, 18 September.
- Faulkner, Neil. 2009. “The Sedgeford Crisis.”Public Archaeology8(1):51–61. · DOI
- Kador, Thomas. in press, 2014. “Public and Community Archaeology – An Irish Perspective.” InPublic Participation in Archaeology, edited by Suzie Thomas and Joanne Lea. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. · DOI
- Moshenska, Gabriel, and Sarah Dhanjal. 2012. “Introduction: Thinking About, Talking About, and Doing Community Archaeology.” InCommunity Archaeology. Themes, Methods and Practices, edited by Gabriel Moshenska and Sarah Dhanjal, 1–5. Oxford: Oxbow. · DOI
- Reilly, Jo. 2013. “Building Resilience: HLF's Investment in Skills for the Future.” Paper presented at “Teaching Museums: Developing Today’s Workforce, Opening the Door for Tomorrow’s”, conference organized by Norfolk Museums and Archaeology Service and held at Norwich Castle Museum and Art Gallery, UK, 2 October.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teaching Archaeological Heritage Management. Towards a Change in Paradigms
Willems, A., Thomas, S., Castillo Mena, A., Čeginskas, V., Immonen, V., Kalakoski, I., Lähdesmäki, T., Lähdesmäki, U., Gowen-Larsen, M., Marciniak, A., et al. (2018) · Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites · doi:10.1080/13505033.2018.1559423 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Sutcliffe, T.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-117
- ISSN
- 2051-8196
- 2051-820X
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review