Cited by 41Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Effect of Controlled Masticatory Exercise on Pain and Muscle Performance in Myofascial Pain Patients: A Pilot Study

Gavish, Anat, Winocur, Ephraim, Astandzelov-Nachmias, Tamara, Gazit, Esther·2006·CRANIO®

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that strengthening masticatory muscles using a controlled chewing exercise protocol improves muscle function, as evaluated quantitatively by electromyogram, and reduces pain at rest and during function. The study included 20 patients diagnosed with myofascial pain according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders with low masseter volume increase during maximal clench. The exercise group (ten patients) was subjected to a controlled gum chewing exercise protocol for eight weeks: the control group (ten patients) received only support and encouragement. Patients were examined at the beginning and at the end of the experiment which included an electromyogram (EMG) to assess muscle performance, masticatory muscle tenderness to palpation, mouth opening range, subjective anamnestic indices to evaluate pain perception and pain relief, and chewing tests. The EMG showed that the masticatory muscle exercise did produce objective physiologic results. In the exercise group, a significant increase was found in the electric muscle activity of the masseters during maximal voluntary clench (p=0.007). The exercise group showed significant reduction in pain during rest, pain during the chewing test, and a disability score. At the end of the study, a difference between the two groups was shown in the Pain Relief Scale: significantly greater pain relief was found in the exercise group as compared to the control group (p=…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/crn.2006.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gavish, A., Winocur, E., Astandzelov-Nachmias, T., & Gazit, E.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
CRANIO®
Published
2006-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
184-190
ISSN
  • 0734-5410 (ISSN-L)
  • 0886-9634
  • 2151-0903
OpenAlex
W1997684355
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CRANIO® (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
myofascial pain, masseter muscle, muscle strength, analgesia, temporomandibular disorders, electromyography, muscle tenderness, mouth opening range, disability score
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Chewing Gum, Electromyography, Exercise Therapy, Facial Pain, Female, Humans, Masseter Muscle, Mastication, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Myofunctional Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review