Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intellectual Property Issues in Heritage Management: Part 2: Legal Dimensions, Ethical Considerations, and Collaborative Research Practices

Nicholas, George, Bell, Catherine, Coombe, Rosemary, Welch, John R., Noble, Brian, Anderson, Jane, Bannister, Kelly, Watkins, Joe·2010·Heritage Management
DOI 10.1179/hma.2010.3.1.117
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/hma.2010.3.1.117

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Anderson Jane, 2009, Nomorepotlucks, 4
  2. Bell Catherine, 2008, Repatriation and Heritage Protection: Reflections on the Kainai Experi-ence. In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices, and Perspectives, pp. 203
  3. Blake Janet, 2009, Convention on Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Implica-tions of Community Involvment in 'Safeguarding: In Intangible Heritage, pp. 45
  4. Blood Narcise, 2006, Repatriating Precarious Blackfoot Sites. Paper presented to the Canadian Political Science Association, York University, Toronto
  5. Borrows, 1996, McGill Law Journal, 41, 629
  6. Chakrabarty, Dipesh 2000 Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  7. Harding Sarah, 1999, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 291
  8. Kymlicka, Will 1989 Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford University Press, New York.
  9. Little Bear, Leroy, 1986, Aboriginal Rights and the Canadian Grundnorm, pp. 243
  10. Marrie Henrietta, 2009, The UNESCO, pp. 169
  11. Miller Jim, 2009, Compact
  12. Solomon Maui, 2004, Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Responsibilities, pp. 221
  13. Tamang, Parshuram 2004 An Overview of the Principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Indigenous Peoples in International and Domestic Law and Practices. PFII/2004/WS.2/8. Presented to UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Workshop on Free, Prior, and Informed Consent, January 17–19, 2005.
  14. Tsosie Rebecca, 1999, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 583
  15. Vitelli, Karen D., and Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh (editors) 2006 Archaeological Ethics, 2nd edition. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.
  16. Yellowhorn Eldon, 1996, Native Studies Review, 11, 23
  17. Zedetio, 2007, SAA Archaeological Record, 7, 9
  18. Brown Michael, 2005, International Journal of Cultural Heritage, 12, 40
  19. Coombe, 2005, Florida Journal of Interna-tional Law, 17, 115
  20. Helfer Laurence, 2007, University of California Davis Law Review, 40, 971
  21. Smith Laurajane, and Natsuko Akagawa (editors) 2009 Intangible Cultural Heritage. Routledge, London.
  22. Teubner Gunther, and Andreas Fischer-Lescano, 2008, In Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Legal Protection in a Digital Environment, pp. 17
  23. Tobin Brendan, 2009, Setting Protection of Traditional Knowledge to Rights: Placing Human Rights and Customary Law at the Heart of Traditional Knowledge Gover-nance, pp. 101
  24. Bannister Kelly, 2009, Non-legal Instruments for Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Key Roles for Ethical Codes & Community Protocols, pp. 278
  25. Bannister Kelly, 2006, Harm and Alternatives: Cultures under Siege, pp. 215
  26. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, Julie Hollowell, and Dru McGill 2008 Ethics in Action: Case Studies in Archaeological Dilemmas. SAA Press, Washington, D.C.
  27. 10.4135/9781483385686 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Manderson Lenore, 1998, Human Organization, 57.2:215
  29. Meskell, Lynn, and Peter Pels (editors) 2005 Embedding Ethics. Berg, Oxford.
  30. Nicholas, 2007, Ethical Challenges to a Postcolonial Archaeology, pp. 59
  31. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai 1999 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Otago University Press, Otego, and Zed Books, New York.
  32. Bell Catherine, 2008, Introduction, Methodology and Thematic Overview, pp. 1
  33. Buggey Susan, 2008, Cultural Landscapes: Venues for Community-based Conservation, pp. 164
  34. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, and T. J. Ferguson (editors) 2008 Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communi-ties. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.
  35. 10.4135/9781483385686 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1179/175355309X457196 · DOI
  37. Harrison Barbara, 2001, Collaborative Programs in Indigenous Communities
  38. Stephens, David 2009 Qualitiative Research in International Settings: A Practical Guide. Routledge, Oxon and New York.
  39. Watkins Joe, 2005, In Handbook of Archaeological Methods, pp. 1372
  40. Welch, 2009, Dzit Nchaa Si An (Mount Graham) and Federal Agency: Decisions Affecting American Indian Sacred Sites. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 33, 29

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nicholas, G., Bell, C., Coombe, R., Welch, J. R., Noble, B., Anderson, J., Bannister, K., & Watkins, J.
Venue
Heritage Management
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-04
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
117-147
ISSN
1940-8439
DOI
10.1179/hma.2010.3.1.117
Cited by
9
References
99
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.