Cited by 88Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Identification of Cellulosic Fibres by FTIR Spectroscopy DIFFERENTIATION OF FLAX AND HEMP BY POLARIZED ATR FTIR

Garside, Paul, Wyeth, Paul·2006·Studies in Conservation

Abstract

The ability to identify accurately natural fibres is of importance to conservators, but this can prove problematic when dealing with fibres which possess similar chemistry and microstructure – the bast fibres flax and hemp are particularly challenging in this regard. Conventional techniques, such as microscopic examination, the measurement of fibre widths and the use of the twist test, will often prove unreliable, especially when dealing with degraded materials. This research has concentrated on the development of an attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopic technique employing polarized radiation to differentiate these two fibre types on the basis of the characteristic nature of the winding of their secondary cell walls: while the angle of fibrillar wind is roughly the same for both fibres (∼7°), the senses of wind are opposite – S (anti-clockwise) in the case of flax; Z (clockwise) for hemp. A crystallinity index, derived from the spectra, was found to vary in a systematic manner as the fibres were rotated with respect to the electric vector of the incident radiation. A good correlation between this variation and theoretical models was observed. It was found that the characteristic sense and angle of wind of the fibres could be determined, and thus hemp and flax distinguished.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/sic.2006.51.3.205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The diameters of ultimate fibers are consistent with surveys of Linum fiber widths.

    “The diameters of ultimate fibers are consistent with surveys of Linum fiber widths (Catling and Grayson 1982;Garside and Wyeth 2006).”

    From Investigating a Dated Piece of the Shroud of Turin (2010) · cites this paper as Garside and Wyeth 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garside, P., & Wyeth, P.
Venue
Studies in Conservation
Published
2006-01
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
205-211
ISSN
  • 0039-3630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-0584
OpenAlex
W2080352909
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Studies in Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
flax, hemp, bast fibers, fiber identification, crystallinity index, polarized radiation, natural fibers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review