CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Biblical Studies and InterpretationArchaeology and Historical StudiesAncient Near East History

A Literary Ostracon from Horvat 'Uza

Beit-Arieh, Itzhaq·1993·Tel Aviv
DOI 10.1179/tav.1993.1993.1.55
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

(Extrait de Res.d'A.). Despite the fact that more than half the words of the inscription are undecipherable, those that remain give the impression that this was an unconventional document. The content is never eonomic nor administrative (like most 8th-6th centuries B.C.E. ostraca from Israel and Judah), but rather of a literary character couched in elevated biblical language. (...).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/tav.1993.1993.1.55

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scholars have not reached a consensus on the genre, content, or purpose of HU-1.

    “so far there has been no consensus on its genre.”

    From Unrecognized Prophetic Ostracon from Ḥorvat ʿUza (2021) · cites this paper as Beit-Arieh 1993: 55-65

  • The most convincing meaning of ʿwll is 'infant, child.'

    “The most convincing meaning of ʿwll is “infant, child” (Beit-Arieh 1993: 61;Davies 2005: 158;Aḥituv 2008: 175-76;Becking 2010: 34;Na'aman 2013: 227).”

    From Unrecognized Prophetic Ostracon from Ḥorvat ʿUza (2021) · cites this paper as Beit-Arieh 1993: 61

  • The reconstruction qb[r]kh makes the most sense in context.

    “The reconstruction qb[r]kh, first suggested by Naveh (Beit-Arieh 1993: 62; 2007: 126), makes the most sense in this context, as it flows with what precedes this word in the beginning of l. 12 as well as what follows in l. 13.”

    From Unrecognized Prophetic Ostracon from Ḥorvat ʿUza (2021) · cites this paper as Beit-Arieh 1993: 62

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beit-Arieh, I.
Corresponding author
Beit-Arieh, Itzhaq
Venue
Tel Aviv
Publisher
Maney Publishing
Published
1993-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
55-65
ISSN
  • 0334-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-4786
DOI
10.1179/tav.1993.1993.1.55
OpenAlex
W2081340918
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 21 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tel Aviv (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
biblical language, Hebrew inscriptions, Iron Age Israel, Judah, decipherment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review