Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Current trends in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe

Gratwohl, Alois, Baldomero, Helen, Horisberger, Bruno, Schmid, Caroline, Passweg, Jakob, Urbano-Ispizua, Alvaro·2002·Blood

Abstract

Major changes have occurred in the transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) during the last decade. This report reveals the changes, reflects current status, and provides medium-term projections of HSC transplantation (HSCT) development in Europe. Data on 132 963 patients, 44 165 with allogeneic HSC transplant (33%) and 88 798 with an autologous HSC transplant (67%), collected prospectively from 619 centers by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) in 35 European countries between 1990 (4234 HSCTs) and 2000 (19 136 HSCTs) illustrate utilization of HSCT. HSCT increased in all European countries and for all indications. There were major differences depending on disease indication and donor type. Transplantation rates (numbers of HSCTs per 10 million inhabitants) varied from less than 1 for some rare indications to 37.7 ± 4.1 for acute myeloid leukemia in allogeneic HSCT or 95.5 ± 13.5 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in autologous HSCT. There were indications with a steady, continuing increase and others with initial increase but subsequent decrease. Projections on medium-term development for each disease based on a weighted sensitivity analysis predict an ongoing increase in allogeneic HSCT except for chronic myeloid leukemia. In autologous HSCT they predict an increase for lymphoproliferative disorders, acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, and some solid tumors but a decrease for most solid tumors, acute lymphoid leukemia, and chronic myeloid leukemia. Transplantation rates can be predicted with reasonable sensitivity for most disease indications. Despite marked changes in the rapidly developing field of HSCT, this information on current use, trends, and midterm predictions forms a rational basis for patient counseling and health care planning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0675

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Gratwohl, A., Baldomero, H., Horisberger, B., Schmid, C., Passweg, J., & Urbano-Ispizua, A.
Venue
Blood
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
100
Issue
7
Pages
2374-2386
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1983235867
Cited by
214
References
0
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current trends in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2002-03-0675
The paper
Gratwohl, A., Baldomero, H., Horisberger, B., Schmid, C., Passweg, J., & Urbano-Ispizua, A. (2002). Current trends in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-03-0675

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.