The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Abstract
The optimal induction for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unknown. Several anthracyclines have been proposed, but the data remain equivocal. Additionally, few prospective trials of priming with hematopoietic growth factors to cycle leukemia cells prior to induction chemotherapy have been conducted. Three hundred and sixty-two older adults with previously untreated AML were randomized to either daunorubicin, idarubicin or mitoxantrone with a standard dose of cytarabine as induction therapy. In addition, 245 patients were also randomized to receive granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or placebo beginning 2 days prior to induction chemotherapy and continuing until marrow aplasia. No difference was observed in the disease-free overall survival or in toxicity among patients receiving any of the 3 induction regimens or among those receiving growth factor or placebo for priming. However, the complete remission rate for the first 113 analyzable patients, who did not participate in the priming study and started induction therapy 3 to 5 days earlier than those who did, was significantly higher (50% versus 38%; P = .03). None of the anthracyclines is associated with improved outcome in older adults. Priming with hematopoietic growth factor did not improve response when compared with placebo. Furthermore, delaying induction therapy in older adults may lead to a lower complete remission rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fenaux, P., Mufti, G. J., Hellström-Lindberg, E., Santini, V., Gattermann, N., Germing, U., Sanz, G., List, A. F., Gore, S., Seymour, J. F., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.23.8329 · Cited by 961
Valproic acid stimulates proliferation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells.
Bug, G., Gül, H., Schwarz, K., Pfeifer, H., Kampfmann, M., Zheng, X., Beissert, T., Boehrer, S., Hoelzer, D., Ottmann, O. G., et al. (2005) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-3011 · Cited by 195
Khoury, H. J., Collins, R. H., Blum, W., Stiff, P. S., Elias, L., Lebkowski, J. S., Reddy, A., Nishimoto, K. P., Sen, D., Wirth, E. D., et al. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30696 · Cited by 102
Sekeres, M. A., Gundacker, H., Lancet, J., Advani, A., Petersdorf, S., Liesveld, J., Mulford, D., Norwood, T., Willman, C. L., Appelbaum, F. R., et al. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-02-337303 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rowe, J. M., Neuberg, D., Friedenberg, W., Bennett, J. M., Paietta, E., Makary, A. Z., Liesveld, J. L., Abboud, C. N., Dewald, G., Hayes, F. A., Tallman, M. S., & Wiernik, P. H.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2004-01-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-485
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2159256284
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1686
- The paper
- Rowe, J. M., Neuberg, D., Friedenberg, W., Bennett, J. M., Paietta, E., Makary, A. Z., Liesveld, J. L., Abboud, C. N., Dewald, G., Hayes, F. A., Tallman, M. S., & Wiernik, P. H. (2004). A phase 3 study of three induction regimens and of priming with GM-CSF in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-05-1686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.