Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade for the treatment of acute GVHD

Couriel, Daniel, Saliba, Rima, Hicks, Krystal, Ippoliti, Cindy, de Lima, Marcos, Hosing, Chitra, Khouri, Issa, Andersson, Borje, Gajewski, James, Donato, Michele, Anderlini, Paolo, Kontoyiannis, Dimitrios P., Cohen, Agueda, Martin, Thomas, Giralt, Sergio, Champlin, Richard·2004·Blood

Abstract

Despite posttransplantation immunosuppressive therapy, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major cause of sickness and death. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is implicated in the pathophysiology of GVHD at several steps in the process. Infliximab is a genetically constructed immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) murine–human chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds the soluble subunit and the membrane-bound precursor of TNF-α, blocking its interaction with receptors and causing lysis of cells that produce TNF-α. In this study we retrospectively evaluated 134 patients who had steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Of these, 21 who received infliximab as a single agent were analyzed. The overall response rate was 67% (n = 14), and 13 patients (62%) experienced complete response (CR). Five patients (24%) did not respond, and 2 (10%) had progressive GVHD. None had a toxic reaction to infliximab. Ten patients (48%) had 18 fungal infections, including Aspergillus species in 7 and Candida species in 10. Seventeen patients (81%) had bacterial infections, including 32 gram-positive and 8 gram-negative infections. Viral infections, primarily cytomegalovirus reactivation, occurred in 14 patients (67%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 38%. In conclusion, infliximab was well tolerated and active for the treatment of steroid-resistant acute GVHD, particularly with gastrointestinal tract involvement. Survival after steroid-resistant acute GVHD continues to be problematic. The possibility of excessive fungal and other infections must be explored further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2003-12-4241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Couriel, D., Saliba, R., Hicks, K., Ippoliti, C., de Lima, M., Hosing, C., Khouri, I., Andersson, B., Gajewski, J., Donato, M., Anderlini, P., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Cohen, A., Martin, T., Giralt, S., & Champlin, R.
Venue
Blood
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
649-654
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2169004170
Cited by
261
References
2
FWCI
12.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade for the treatment of acute GVHD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2003-12-4241
The paper
Couriel, D., Saliba, R., Hicks, K., Ippoliti, C., de Lima, M., Hosing, C., Khouri, I., Andersson, B., Gajewski, J., Donato, M., Anderlini, P., Kontoyiannis, D. P., Cohen, A., Martin, T., Giralt, S., & Champlin, R. (2004). Tumor necrosis factor-α blockade for the treatment of acute GVHD. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-12-4241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.