The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Abstract
Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are stratified into the standard-risk (SR) group due to the absence of adverse prognostic factors relapse in 40% to 55% of the cases. To identify complementary markers suitable for further treatment stratification in SR ALL, we evaluated the predictive value of minimal residual disease (MRD) and prospectively monitored MRD in 196 strictly defined SR ALL patients at up to 9 time points in the first year of treatment by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Frequency of MRD positivity decreased from 88% during early induction to 13% at week 52. MRD was predictive for relapse at various follow-up time points. Combined MRD information from different time points allowed definition of 3 risk groups (P < .001): 10% of patients with a rapid MRD decline to lower than 10-4 or below detection limit at day 11 and day 24 were classified as low risk and had a 3-year relapse rate (RR) of 0%. A subset of 23% with an MRD of 10-4 or higher until week 16 formed the high-risk group, with a 3-year RR of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-100%). The remaining patients whose RR was 47% (31%-63%) represented the intermediate-risk group. Thus, MRD quantification during treatment identified prognostic subgroups within the otherwise homogeneous SR ALL population who may benefit from individualized treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Pui, C.-H., Robison, L. L., & Look, A. T. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60457-2 · Cited by 1,564
Malard, F., & Mohty, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33018-1 · Cited by 773
Deep-sequencing approach for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Faham, M., Zheng, J., Moorhead, M., Carlton, V. E. H., Stow, P., Coustan-Smith, E., Pui, C.-H., & Campana, D. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-07-444042 · Cited by 423
Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Lu, Y., Zhang, Q., Fan, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Ye, Z., & Xiong, D. (2017) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-017-0397-z · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Brüggemann, M., Raff, T., Flohr, T., Gökbuget, N., Nakao, M., Droese, J., Lüschen, S., Pott, C., Ritgen, M., Scheuring, U., Horst, H.-A., Thiel, E., Hoelzer, D., Bartram, C. R., Kneba, M., & for the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2006-02-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1116-1123
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2109388187
- Cited by
- 537
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708
- The paper
- Brüggemann, M., Raff, T., Flohr, T., Gökbuget, N., Nakao, M., Droese, J., Lüschen, S., Pott, C., Ritgen, M., Scheuring, U., Horst, H.-A., Thiel, E., Hoelzer, D., Bartram, C. R., Kneba, M., & for the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. (2006). Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.