Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Brüggemann, Monika, Raff, Thorsten, Flohr, Thomas, Gökbuget, Nicola, Nakao, Makoto, Droese, Jo, Lüschen, Silke, Pott, Christiane, Ritgen, Matthias, Scheuring, Urban, Horst, Heinz-August, Thiel, Eckhard, Hoelzer, Dieter, Bartram, Claus R., Kneba, Michael, for the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia·2006·Blood

Abstract

Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are stratified into the standard-risk (SR) group due to the absence of adverse prognostic factors relapse in 40% to 55% of the cases. To identify complementary markers suitable for further treatment stratification in SR ALL, we evaluated the predictive value of minimal residual disease (MRD) and prospectively monitored MRD in 196 strictly defined SR ALL patients at up to 9 time points in the first year of treatment by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Frequency of MRD positivity decreased from 88% during early induction to 13% at week 52. MRD was predictive for relapse at various follow-up time points. Combined MRD information from different time points allowed definition of 3 risk groups (P < .001): 10% of patients with a rapid MRD decline to lower than 10-4 or below detection limit at day 11 and day 24 were classified as low risk and had a 3-year relapse rate (RR) of 0%. A subset of 23% with an MRD of 10-4 or higher until week 16 formed the high-risk group, with a 3-year RR of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-100%). The remaining patients whose RR was 47% (31%-63%) represented the intermediate-risk group. Thus, MRD quantification during treatment identified prognostic subgroups within the otherwise homogeneous SR ALL population who may benefit from individualized treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Brüggemann, M., Raff, T., Flohr, T., Gökbuget, N., Nakao, M., Droese, J., Lüschen, S., Pott, C., Ritgen, M., Scheuring, U., Horst, H.-A., Thiel, E., Hoelzer, D., Bartram, C. R., Kneba, M., & for the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Venue
Blood
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
1116-1123
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2109388187
Cited by
537
References
1
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708
The paper
Brüggemann, M., Raff, T., Flohr, T., Gökbuget, N., Nakao, M., Droese, J., Lüschen, S., Pott, C., Ritgen, M., Scheuring, U., Horst, H.-A., Thiel, E., Hoelzer, D., Bartram, C. R., Kneba, M., & for the German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. (2006). Clinical significance of minimal residual disease quantification in adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-07-2708

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.