Cited by 176Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior thalidomide exposure

Open access

Abstract

This analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with thalidomide. Of 704 patients, 39% were thalidomide exposed. Thalidomide-exposed patients had more prior lines of therapy and longer duration of myeloma than thalidomide-naive patients. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone led to higher overall response rate (ORR), longer time to progression (TTP), and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo + dexamethasone despite prior thalidomide exposure. Among lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients, ORR was higher in thalidomide-naive versus thalidomide-exposed patients (P = .04), with longer median TTP (P = .04) and PFS (P = .02). Likewise for dexamethasone alone-treated patients (P = .03 for ORR, P = .03 for TTP, P = .06 for PFS). Prior thalidomide did not affect survival in lenalidomide + dexamethasone-treated patients (36.1 vs 33.3 months, P > .05). Thalidomide-naive and thalidomide-exposed patients had similar toxicities. Lenalidomide + dexamethasone resulted in higher rates of venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, and infections versus placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Lenalido-mide + dexamethasone was superior to placebo + dexamethasone, independent of prior thalidomide exposure. Although prior thalidomide may have contributed to inferior TTP and PFS compared with thalidomide-naive patients, these parameters remained superior compared with placebo + dexamethasone; similar benefits compared with placebo + dexamethasone were not evident for thalidomide-exposed patients in terms of overall survival. Studies were registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00056160 and NCT00424047.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2008-02-141614

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pomalidomide is most often used in combination with dexamethasone, either alone or as part of triplet regimens with bortezomib, daratumumab or elotuzumab.

    “Pomalidomide is most often used in combination with dexamethasone, either alone or as part of triplet regimens with a variety of other anti-myeloma agents, including bortezomib45, daratumumab46 or elotuzumab47.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 176

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kumar, 2008, Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies., Blood, 111, 2516, 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129 · DOI
  2. Wang, 2007, Effect of Lea/Der in MM despite thal resistance., Haematologica, 92

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Dimopoulos, M. A., Chen, C., Cibeira, M. T., Attal, M., Spencer, A., Rajkumar, S. V., Yu, Z., Olesnyckyj, M., Zeldis, J. B., Knight, R. D., & Weber, D. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
Venue
Blood
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
4445-4451
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1994721812
Cited by
176
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
17.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Celgene
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
lenalidomide, dexamethasone, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, overall response rate, progression-free survival, time to progression, venous thromboembolism, myelosuppression, infection, drug safety
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Placebos, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Thalidomide, Survival Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review