Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential

Open access
Kent, David G., Copley, Michael R., Benz, Claudia, Wöhrer, Stefan, Dykstra, Brad J., Ma, Elaine, Cheyne, John, Zhao, Yongjun, Bowie, Michelle B., Zhao, Yun, Gasparetto, Maura, Delaney, Allen, Smith, Clayton, Marra, Marco, Eaves, Connie J.·2009·Blood

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are generally defined by their dual properties of pluripotency and extensive self-renewal capacity. However, a lack of experimental clarity as to what constitutes extensive self-renewal capacity coupled with an absence of methods to prospectively isolate long-term repopulating cells with defined self-renewal activities has made it difficult to identify the essential components of the self-renewal machinery and investigate their regulation. We now show that cells capable of repopulating irradiated congenic hosts for 4 months and producing clones of cells that can be serially transplanted are selectively and highly enriched in the CD150+ subset of the EPCR+CD48−CD45+ fraction of mouse fetal liver and adult bone marrow cells. In contrast, cells that repopulate primary hosts for the same period but show more limited self-renewal activity are enriched in the CD150− subset. Comparative transcriptome analyses of these 2 subsets with each other and with HSCs whose self-renewal activity has been rapidly extinguished in vitro revealed 3 new genes (VWF, Rhob, Pld3) whose elevated expression is a consistent and selective feature of the long-term repopulating cells with durable self-renewal capacity. These findings establish the identity of a phenotypically and molecularly distinct class of pluripotent hematopoietic cells with lifelong self-renewal capacity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2008-12-192054

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Kent, D. G., Copley, M. R., Benz, C., Wöhrer, S., Dykstra, B. J., Ma, E., Cheyne, J., Zhao, Y., Bowie, M. B., Zhao, Y., Gasparetto, M., Delaney, A., Smith, C., Marra, M., & Eaves, C. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2009-06-18
Volume
113
Issue
25
Pages
6342-6350
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2011712807
Cited by
342
References
60
FWCI
14.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2008-12-192054
The paper
Kent, D. G., Copley, M. R., Benz, C., Wöhrer, S., Dykstra, B. J., Ma, E., Cheyne, J., Zhao, Y., Bowie, M. B., Zhao, Y., Gasparetto, M., Delaney, A., Smith, C., Marra, M., & Eaves, C. J. (2009). Prospective isolation and molecular characterization of hematopoietic stem cells with durable self-renewal potential. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-12-192054

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.